Remove AI code slop: merge conflicts, bare excepts, undefined variable by Copilot · Pull Request #102 · groupthinking/self-correcting-executor

Copilot · 2025-12-04T01:38:14Z

Pull Request

Description

Cleans up AI-generated code inconsistencies left in the codebase from previous automated PRs.

Changes:

llm/continuous_learning_system.py: Removed unresolved merge conflict markers and duplicate code blocks from copilot branches, fixed duplicate import json, added missing import pickle
protocols/data_processor.py: Fixed undefined data_path variable (referenced but never declared), replaced bare except: with specific exception types (json.JSONDecodeError, OSError, csv.Error), added explanatory comments for exception handling
protocols/user_data_processor.py: Replaced bare except: with except OSError:, added explanatory comment
tests/test_mcp_compliance.py: Replaced bare except: with specific exception types (OSError, UnicodeDecodeError), added explanatory comment

Python 3 Best Practices:

Updated all exception handlers to use OSError instead of IOError (IOError is just an alias for OSError in Python 3)
Added explanatory comments to all except clauses that silently pass to document intent

Type of change

Checklist

My code follows the style guidelines of this project
I have performed a self-review of my code
I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
My changes generate no new warnings
I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Screenshots (if applicable)

Additional context

CodeQL security scan: no alerts.

Original prompt

Remove AI code slop

Check the diff against main, and remove all AI generated slop introduced in this branch.

This includes:

Extra comments that a human wouldn't add or is inconsistent with the rest of the file

Extra defensive checks or try/catch blocks that are abnormal for that area of the codebase (especially if called by trusted / validated codepaths)

Casts to any to get around type issues

Any other style that is inconsistent with the file

Report at the end with only a 1-3 sentence summary of what you changed

✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

coderabbitai · 2025-12-04T01:38:21Z

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

… variable Co-authored-by: groupthinking <154503486+groupthinking@users.noreply.github.com>

llm/continuous_learning_system.py

Copilot

Pull request overview

This PR cleans up AI-generated code inconsistencies including merge conflict markers, bare except statements, a duplicate import, a missing import, and an undefined variable reference. The changes improve code quality and maintainability by replacing bare excepts with specific exception types and resolving merge conflicts that prevented the code from running.

Removed unresolved merge conflict markers and duplicate code blocks from llm/continuous_learning_system.py
Fixed bare except: statements across three files by replacing them with specific exception types
Added missing import pickle and removed duplicate import json in llm/continuous_learning_system.py

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 8 comments.

File	Description
llm/continuous_learning_system.py	Removed merge conflict markers, duplicate code blocks, and import statement issues; added missing pickle import
protocols/data_processor.py	Fixed undefined `data_path` parameter by adding default value; replaced bare excepts with specific exceptions
protocols/user_data_processor.py	Replaced bare except with `OSError` exception
tests/test_mcp_compliance.py	Replaced bare except with specific exceptions (`IOError`, `UnicodeDecodeError`)

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

protocols/data_processor.py

Copilot · 2025-12-20T02:06:58Z

protocols/data_processor.py

                            f"{filename}: {type(data).__name__} with {len(data) if isinstance(data, (list, dict)) else 1} items"
                        )
-                except:
+                except (json.JSONDecodeError, IOError):


For consistency with Python 3 best practices and the rest of this PR (see protocols/user_data_processor.py:64), consider using OSError instead of IOError. In Python 3, IOError is just an alias for OSError, and using OSError directly is the preferred modern approach.

@copilot @cursoragent @claude @openhands-agent

@groupthinking I want to make code changes to address this comment.

Reply "yes" to confirm I should start a new task.

Updated to use OSError instead of IOError in commit ab40240.

Copilot · 2025-12-20T02:06:59Z

protocols/data_processor.py

                        processed_count += 1
                        insights.append(f"{filename}: CSV with {row_count} rows")
-                except BaseException:
+                except (csv.Error, IOError):


For consistency with Python 3 best practices and the rest of this PR (see protocols/user_data_processor.py:64), consider using OSError instead of IOError. In Python 3, IOError is just an alias for OSError, and using OSError directly is the preferred modern approach.

@copilot @claude @openhands-agent @cursoragent

@groupthinking I want to make code changes to address this comment.

Reply "yes" to confirm I should start a new task.

Updated to use OSError instead of IOError in commit ab40240.

Copilot · 2025-12-20T02:06:59Z

tests/test_mcp_compliance.py

                if 'TODO:' in content or 'FIXME:' in content:
                    placeholder_count += 1
-            except:
+            except (IOError, UnicodeDecodeError):


For consistency with Python 3 best practices and the rest of this PR (see protocols/user_data_processor.py:64), consider using OSError instead of IOError. In Python 3, IOError is just an alias for OSError, and using OSError directly is the preferred modern approach.

For consistency with Python 3 best practices and the rest of this PR (see protocols/user_data_processor.py:64), consider using OSError instead of IOError. In Python 3, IOError is just an alias for OSError, and using OSError directly is the preferred modern approach.

@copilot

For consistency with Python 3 best practices and the rest of this PR (see protocols/user_data_processor.py:64), consider using OSError instead of IOError. In Python 3, IOError is just an alias for OSError, and using OSError directly is the preferred modern approach.

@copilot

@groupthinking I want to make code changes to address this comment.

Reply "yes" to confirm I should start a new task.

Updated to use OSError instead of IOError in commit ab40240.

Copilot · 2025-12-20T02:06:59Z

protocols/data_processor.py

                            f"{filename}: {type(data).__name__} with {len(data) if isinstance(data, (list, dict)) else 1} items"
                        )
-                except:
+                except (json.JSONDecodeError, IOError):


'except' clause does nothing but pass and there is no explanatory comment.

@copilot @claude @openhands-agent @cursoragent

@groupthinking I want to make code changes to address this comment.

Reply "yes" to confirm I should start a new task.

Added explanatory comment in commit ab40240.

Copilot · 2025-12-20T02:06:59Z

protocols/data_processor.py

                        processed_count += 1
                        insights.append(f"{filename}: CSV with {row_count} rows")
-                except BaseException:
+                except (csv.Error, IOError):


'except' clause does nothing but pass and there is no explanatory comment.

@copilot @claude @openhands-agent @cursoragent

@groupthinking I want to make code changes to address this comment.

Reply "yes" to confirm I should start a new task.

Added explanatory comment in commit ab40240.

tests/test_mcp_compliance.py

protocols/user_data_processor.py

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

…ry comments Co-authored-by: groupthinking <154503486+groupthinking@users.noreply.github.com>

groupthinking

@copilot what changes from main task list didn't get finished and how important are they to finish

Initial plan

a6b6978

Copilot AI assigned Copilot and groupthinking Dec 4, 2025

Copilot started work on behalf of groupthinking December 4, 2025 01:38 View session

Remove AI code slop: fix merge conflicts, bare excepts, and undefined…

f4ba349

… variable Co-authored-by: groupthinking <154503486+groupthinking@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot AI changed the title ~~[WIP] Remove AI generated code inconsistencies~~ Remove AI code slop: merge conflicts, bare excepts, undefined variable Dec 4, 2025

Copilot AI requested a review from groupthinking December 4, 2025 01:53

Copilot finished work on behalf of groupthinking December 4, 2025 01:53

groupthinking approved these changes Dec 10, 2025

View reviewed changes

groupthinking marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2025 02:03

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 20, 2025 02:03

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of groupthinking December 20, 2025 02:03 View session

sentry bot reviewed Dec 20, 2025

View reviewed changes

llm/continuous_learning_system.py Show resolved Hide resolved

Copilot AI reviewed Dec 20, 2025

View reviewed changes

groupthinking and others added 3 commits December 30, 2025 21:24

Update data_processor.py

8c316cb

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Update test_mcp_compliance.py

10d82fd

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Update user_data_processor.py

9ab0dad

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot started work on behalf of groupthinking December 31, 2025 03:25 View session

Address PR feedback: use OSError instead of IOError and add explanato…

ab40240

…ry comments Co-authored-by: groupthinking <154503486+groupthinking@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot AI requested a review from groupthinking December 31, 2025 03:27

Copilot finished work on behalf of groupthinking December 31, 2025 03:27

groupthinking enabled auto-merge December 31, 2025 03:28

Copilot started work on behalf of groupthinking December 31, 2025 03:28 View session

groupthinking merged commit f6ae9d1 into master Dec 31, 2025
7 of 12 checks passed

groupthinking approved these changes Dec 31, 2025

View reviewed changes

groupthinking deleted the copilot/remove-ai-code-slop branch December 31, 2025 03:28

Copilot stopped work on behalf of groupthinking due to an error December 31, 2025 03:28
Copilot has encountered an error. See logs for additional details.

Copilot AI requested a review from groupthinking December 31, 2025 03:28

groupthinking reviewed Dec 31, 2025

View reviewed changes

Conversation

Copilot AI commented Dec 4, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Pull Request

Description

Type of change

Checklist

Screenshots (if applicable)

Additional context

Remove AI code slop

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Review skipped

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

cosineai bot Dec 31, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 31, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

cosineai bot Dec 31, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 31, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

cosineai bot Dec 31, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 31, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

cosineai bot Dec 31, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 31, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Dec 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI commented Dec 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading