Skip to content

Conversation

@AananthV
Copy link

No description provided.

@AananthV AananthV requested review from ctiller and markdroth October 21, 2025 08:25
Copy link
Member

@markdroth markdroth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good! My comments are mostly minor cosmetic things, but there are two small substantive comments.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks!

Copy link
Member

@ejona86 ejona86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So you understand why I'm looking at this so much more closely now vs before: Earlier this was "some metrics y'all wanted for yourselves". And I knew why you'd want them, and why they'd be useful to others, but there wasn't an idea we'd move quickly to implement this cross-language for wide availability. With the idea these are going to be on by default, that means these are seen as being more important/widely used metrics. They are now intended for the masses. Thus I started reviewing them as such.

Since I'm going to be unavailable next week: I'd said the comments I need to say. Once the threads are actually resolved (not just marked resolved), it seems it would be good to go.

Copy link
Member

@ejona86 ejona86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had thought grpc.tcp.connections_created would be paired with a closed counter, as that's what we've done in the past instead of UpDown counters. But I can live with this.

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants