Skip to content

Conversation

@robrwo
Copy link

@robrwo robrwo commented May 17, 2019

This fixes #18 by looking up the actual column from the accessor name for the search condition used to check uniqueness.

robrwo added 8 commits May 17, 2019 15:02
Note that tests still pass with this change.
This causes tests to fail (which is what we want, before we fix
this bug).
This reverts commit e4d66f53b21ce19466769cc067cc9eeaaf34a639.

Note that the tests pass again.
We need the ability to look up original column names from the
accessor names. This allows the information to be cached for
a form.
This fixes gshank#18 by using the column name instead of the accessor
in the search condition.
@robrwo
Copy link
Author

robrwo commented May 29, 2019

@gshank ?

1 similar comment
@robrwo
Copy link
Author

robrwo commented Jun 28, 2019

@gshank ?

@robrwo
Copy link
Author

robrwo commented Jul 2, 2021

It's been over two years since I submitted this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uniqueness checks should use actual column names, not accessors

1 participant