Open
Conversation
gsoares85
commented
Feb 10, 2025
| content, err := github_internal.GetFileContent(owner, repo, file) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| color.Red("❌ ERROR fetching file content: %s\n", err) | ||
| continue |
Owner
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- In the file
cmd/repo_review.go, within thefetchAllSourceCodefunction, we are ignoring any errors that occurred during thegithub_internal.GetFileContentfunction call. It would be better to also handle these errors properly instead of simply continuing the execution. It would be better to include some form of exception handling, for example logging it for future usage.
| func displayRepoAnalysis(repo, summary, useCases, codeReview, securityReview, improvements string) { | ||
| color.Magenta("\n📌 Repository Analysis Summary for %s\n", repo) | ||
| color.Cyan("\n📖 Application Summary:\n") | ||
| fmt.Println(summary) |
Owner
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- In the same file, within the
displayRepoAnalysisfunction, we directly print out the analysis result without checking if they are empty. It might be good to verify these variables prior to printing.
| fmt.Println(summary) | ||
|
|
||
| color.Green("\n✅ Key Use Cases:\n") | ||
| fmt.Println(useCases) |
| fmt.Println(useCases) | ||
|
|
||
| color.Red("\n🚨 Code Quality Issues (Critical Only):\n") | ||
| fmt.Println(codeReview) |
| fmt.Println(codeReview) | ||
|
|
||
| color.Yellow("\n🔒 Security Issues (Critical Only):\n") | ||
| fmt.Println(securityReview) |
| fmt.Println(securityReview) | ||
|
|
||
| color.Blue("\n📈 Key Areas for Improvement:\n") | ||
| fmt.Println(improvements) |
| return nil | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| for _, item := range dirContents { |
Owner
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Inside the
internal/github_internal/github.gofile, within thefetchFilesRecursivefunction, we are not handling the error that might occur during recursive function call. It could potentially cause error hiding or handling issues. An error returned byfetchFilesRecursivefunction should be checked.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func GetFileContent(owner, repo, path string) (string, error) { | ||
| client := NewGithubClient() |
Owner
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- In the same file, within
GetRepositoryFilesRecursiveandGetFileContentfunctions, There seems to be a repetition of theNewGithubClientfunction call for each request, we might consider initiating the client at once and reusing it.
| return resp.Choices[0].Message.Content, nil | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func AnalyzeCodeWithAI(code string, prompt string) (string, error) { |
Owner
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- The new
internal/openai/openai.goseems to be repetitive as the code used inAnalyzePRWithAIandAnalyzeCodeWithAImethods is almost identical, and there might be an opportunity to refactor these two for simplicity and clarity, avoiding repetition.
| prDiff, err := mocks.MockGetPullRequestDiff(prOwner, prTitle, prNumber) | ||
| aiFeedback, err := mocks.MockAnalyzePRWithAI(prDiff) | ||
|
|
||
| report := generateMarkdownReport(pr, files, prDiff, aiFeedback) |
Owner
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Test cases in
cmd/pr_review_test.gofile are not properly handling the errors from the Mock functions. For example, in theTestGenerateMarkdownReporttest case, it might be beneficial to asserterrisnilafter each Mock function call to ensure there are no errors.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.