improve the ordering of packages #53
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Packages are currently being sorted wrong. Packages with few users are showing up at the top because the average rating by a small number of users gets first priority. It would make more sense to sort by the _total_ number of stars rather than the average number, because this will reflect both number of users and how much they like the package in question. More complex sorting schemes (e.g., penalising extra for any instances of one-star) might also make sense.
Owner
|
Thanks - crantastic is not currently in active development, but I'll take a look next time I'm working on it. |
Author
|
Sure thing. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Packages are currently being sorted wrong. Packages with few users are showing up at the top because the average rating by a small number of users gets first priority.
It would make more sense to sort by the total number of stars rather than the average number, because this will reflect both number of users and how much they like the package in question.
More complex sorting schemes (e.g., penalising extra for any instances of one-star) might also make sense.