Evidence criteria - first pass #5
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
|
The vocab needs to be split up into multiple files inside a vocab folder or into separate recipes. The vocab file also has a lot of formatting issues (specifically the tables and the bottom of the file). |
Collaborator
|
Don't think there is a need to specify every property on the example statements either by the way 😄 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
2nd recipe looking at the transfer of badge definitions via xAPI. Also covers definition of badge criteria, meeting those criteria and badge evidence. This recipe is designed to support the scenario where a badge is defined in one system and awarded by another based on xAPI statements; the whole process is then reported on and the badge displayed to the learner in a 3rd system (and/or one of the first two systems).
I've not expecting this to merge on first go and haven't even reviewed this myself properly yet.
Comments very welcome!