Conversation
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Summary of ChangesHello @igor-holt, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses an inconsistency in how block dimensions were handled, specifically for scalar states within single blocks. By standardizing the dimension expansion, it ensures that all states, regardless of the number of blocks, maintain a consistent shape, thereby improving the robustness and predictability of the Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request addresses an inconsistency in how scalar states are handled for single blocks. By removing the special case for a single collected state in block_state_to_global and always using jax.tree.map with _stack, the code now correctly expands scalar states to have a leading dimension, making their shape (1,) instead of (). This improves consistency with multi-block states which are stacked into shapes like (N,). The change simplifies the code and removes a TODO comment. A new regression test has been added to verify this fix, covering both single and multi-block scenarios. The implementation is clean and the test is comprehensive. This is a great improvement.
Fixed inconsistency where single-block scalar states were not expanded to have a leading dimension. Removed special handling for len(collected) == 1 to always use _stack. Added regression test.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 10423846750295347954 started by @igor-holt