Conversation
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Summary of ChangesHello @igor-holt, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refactors the Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the _resize_sd function by moving it from inside the sample_single_block function to the module level. This is a good change that improves code structure and clarity. By making _resize_sd a pure, module-level function, the code becomes more modular and easier to reason about. While the PR description mentions performance, the primary benefit here is the structural improvement, as a lambda function is still created within the loop where sample_single_block is called. Overall, this is a positive change for code quality and I approve of the changes.
What: The
_resize_sdfunction was defined inside thesample_single_blockfunction, which is called inside a loop. This change moves the definition to the module level.Why: Defining a function inside a loop creates a new function object and closure every time. In large models with thousands of blocks, this adds unnecessary Python overhead during JAX tracing. Moving it out improves code efficiency and clarity.
Measured Improvement:
While the measured improvement in tracing time is negligible (due to JAX tracing overhead dominating), the change eliminates redundant operations and improves code structure.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 6386688111311676134 started by @igor-holt