-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
Make the detailed coverage table in PR comment optional #43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make the detailed coverage table in PR comment optional #43
Conversation
|
CLA Assistant Lite bot ✅ All contributors have signed the CLA |
Code Coverage Summary (test-no-branch.xml)Diff against mainResults for commit: a6dafaa Minimum allowed coverage is ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results |
Code Coverage Summary (test-missing-lines.xml)Results for commit: a6dafaa Minimum allowed coverage is ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results |
|
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA |
…thub.com:insightsengineering/coverage-action into add-parameter-to-publish-only-diff-as-pr-comment
cicdguy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would you be able to add a test case for this also? See other test workflows (they come from a matrix).
Code Coverage Summary (test-no-branch.xml) without detailed coverageResults for commit: a6dafaa Minimum allowed coverage is ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results |
Code Coverage Summary (test-missing-lines.xml) without detailed coverageResults for commit: a6dafaa Minimum allowed coverage is ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results |
cicdguy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Example.
Closes #42