Skip to content

Conversation

@averissimo
Copy link
Contributor

Pull Request

  • Fallback to a default TESTING_DEPTH if a helper file is included
  • Make the check agnostic of the target
  • Remove redundant code

Signed-off-by: André Veríssimo <211358+averissimo@users.noreply.github.com>
@averissimo averissimo requested a review from a team as a code owner December 19, 2025 13:07
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Unit Tests Summary

3 tests   2 ✅  4s ⏱️
3 suites  1 💤
1 files    0 ❌

Results for commit e89d546.

Copy link
Contributor

@llrs-roche llrs-roche left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for also opening to other target branches.
Great renaming of the variable.

This was tested on TMC insightsengineering/teal.modules.clinical#1452, on this step we can see it reset to the workflow default.

@llrs-roche llrs-roche self-assigned this Dec 19, 2025
@averissimo averissimo merged commit 5719594 into main Jan 7, 2026
26 checks passed
@averissimo averissimo deleted the fix_default_testing_depth branch January 7, 2026 13:22
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 7, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants