feat(raf-993): signing of open payments http payload. #3407
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Deploy Preview for brilliant-pasca-3e80ec canceled.
|
🚀 Performance Test ResultsTest Configuration:
Test Metrics:
📜 Logs |
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Comment on lines
84
to
116
| app.post('/http-signature-verify', async function handler(ffReq, ffReply) { | ||
| const requestBody = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(ffReq.body)) | ||
| if (!validateBodyVerifySignature(requestBody as RequestBodySignatureVerify)) { | ||
| return { | ||
| statusCode: '400', | ||
| body: 'Insufficient data in request body' | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| const { method, url, headers, body } = requestBody | ||
|
|
||
| if (!headers['signature'] || !headers['signature-input']) { | ||
| return { | ||
| statusCode: '400', | ||
| body: '[signature-input] and/or [signature] headers are missing' | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (!validateSignatureHeaders({ | ||
| method, | ||
| url, | ||
| headers, | ||
| body | ||
| })) { | ||
| return { | ||
| statusCode: '401', | ||
| body: 'Signature verification failed' | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| ffReply.code(200).send({ | ||
| signatureVerified: true | ||
| }) | ||
| }) |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Missing rate limiting High test
Comment on lines
+197
to
+199
| const interactResponse = await fetch(startInteractionUrl, { | ||
| redirect: 'manual' // dont follow redirects | ||
| }) |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Server-side request forgery Critical test
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix
AI 8 months ago
To fix the issue, we need to ensure that the startInteractionUrl is validated before being used in the fetch call. The best approach is to implement an allow-list mechanism for acceptable domains or URLs. This ensures that only predefined, trusted URLs can be used, effectively mitigating the SSRF vulnerability.
Steps to fix:
- Introduce an allow-list of trusted domains or URLs.
- Validate the
startInteractionUrlagainst this allow-list before using it in thefetchcall. - Reject requests with invalid or untrusted URLs, returning an appropriate error response.
Suggested changeset
1
test/sign-server/src/app.ts
| @@ -195,2 +195,12 @@ | ||
|
|
||
| // Validate startInteractionUrl | ||
| const allowedDomains = ['https://trusted-domain.com', 'https://another-trusted-domain.com']; | ||
| const isValidUrl = allowedDomains.some(domain => startInteractionUrl.startsWith(domain)); | ||
| if (!isValidUrl) { | ||
| return { | ||
| statusCode: '400', | ||
| body: `Invalid startInteractionUrl: '${startInteractionUrl}'` | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Start interaction |
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Comment on lines
+214
to
+220
| const acceptResponse = await fetch(acceptUrl, { | ||
| method: 'POST', | ||
| headers: { | ||
| 'x-idp-secret': idpSecret, | ||
| cookie | ||
| } | ||
| }) |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Server-side request forgery Critical test
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix
AI 8 months ago
To fix the SSRF vulnerability, we need to ensure that the interactionServer value is validated before it is used to construct the acceptUrl. The best approach is to implement an allow-list of permitted hostnames or base URLs for interactionServer. This ensures that only predefined, trusted values can be used in the outgoing request.
Steps to fix:
- Define an allow-list of trusted base URLs for
interactionServer. - Validate the
interactionServervalue against this allow-list before constructing theacceptUrl. - Reject requests with invalid or untrusted
interactionServervalues.
Changes needed:
- Add a validation function to check
interactionServeragainst the allow-list. - Modify the
/consent-interactionhandler to validateinteractionServerbefore constructing the URL.
Suggested changeset
1
test/sign-server/src/app.ts
| @@ -195,2 +195,11 @@ | ||
|
|
||
| // Validate interactionServer | ||
| const allowedServers = ['https://trusted-server1.com', 'https://trusted-server2.com']; | ||
| if (!allowedServers.includes(interactionServer)) { | ||
| return { | ||
| statusCode: '400', | ||
| body: `Invalid interactionServer: '${interactionServer}'` | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Start interaction |
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes proposed in this pull request
Context
Checklist
fixes #numberuser-docslabel (if necessary)