Skip to content

Conversation

@fameri
Copy link
Contributor

@fameri fameri commented Jan 9, 2023

typos were fixed readme file. Also a link to the glossary was added

### Taxonomy of SCRO Continuants
### Taxonomy of SCRO Occurrents
> click the image to view the enlarged image in a new tab
![Taxonomy of SCRO Continuants](images/SCRO-Occurrents.png)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't 'Taxonomy of SCRO Continuants' read here 'Taxonomy of SCRO Occurrents'?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the first image is Taxonomy of SCRO Continuants and the second image is Taxonomy of SCRO Occurrents

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I meant line 25 in README.md file:
![Taxonomy of SCRO Continuants](images/SCRO-Occurrents.png)
I think it should read:
![Taxonomy of SCRO Occurrents](images/SCRO-Occurrents.png)

Copy link
Member

@wsobel wsobel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change looks good.

@mereolog mereolog added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 25, 2023

## Example RDF Dataset
This dataset represents a hypothetical supply chain as depicted in [this image](https://github.com/iofoundry/ontology/blob/master/supplychain/Documentation%20&%20Resources/Terms-Patterns-Modules/Ford%20Supply%20Chain.md). The RDF dataset demonstrates how the class "Supply Chain Relationship' is used to represent the strucrue of a supply chain.
- [RDF Dataset](https://github.com/iofoundry/ontology/blob/master/supplychain/data/SCRO_Ford.tt)
Copy link
Contributor

@kbserm kbserm Jan 25, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fameri Going forward, I think you want to put all the artifacts, including the glossary of terms and RDF Dataset, in the repo as much as possible so that are properly versioned along with the ontology.

Also, not sure why I can't add comments to the rest of the text below. there are typos that should be fixed to "Once the general......" and I think better replace the word 're-architectured' with 're-modularized'.

Copy link
Contributor

@kbserm kbserm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minor comments.

@mereolog
Copy link
Contributor

@fameri where are we with this?
I am along because this pull-request is pretty old - almost 4 months.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants