Add tutorial on integrating kubo with index-provider

[ischasny]

No description provided.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +0.24 🎉

Comparison is base (648d6ea) 51.17% compared to head (564bb52) 51.42%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #372      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   51.17%   51.42%   +0.24%     
==========================================
  Files          61       61              
  Lines        4875     4875              
==========================================
+ Hits         2495     2507      +12     
+ Misses       2076     2065      -11     
+ Partials      304      303       -1     

see 4 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[masih]

Thank you for adding this @ischasny 🍻

[masih]

Was this not supported since 0.18.0?

Also link to release notes of Kubo?

[ischasny]

True - fixed the version and added the link. Thanks for review!

[lidel]

Hi all, FYSA these docs encourage use of PUT /routing/v1 feature which has no finalized spec / API (IPIP-378 is wip), no official support in Kubo, but we already have confused users fill bugs caused by your use case and docs, see ipfs/kubo#9823 (comment)

As this is not ready on the Kubo end, nor we have bandwidth to tackle yet another work stream with the skeleton crew,
you need to make a decision: either you contribute time to fix the bug, and all future ones, or remove the docs. 🙏

[ischasny]

Hi all, FYSA these docs encourage use of PUT /routing/v1 feature which has no finalized spec / API (IPIP-378 is wip), no official support in Kubo, but we already have confused users fill bugs caused by your use case and docs, see ipfs/kubo#9823 (comment)

As this is not ready on the Kubo end, nor we have bandwidth to tackle yet another work stream with the skeleton crew, you need to make a decision: either you contribute time to fix the bug, and all future ones, or remove the docs. 🙏

Hi @lidel. Would you be happy if we explicitly mark it as an ☠️Unsupported experimental feature, use it at your own risk ☠️ kind of marker? The reason I’m asking is because we have users who used to use reframe so at least we can provide them with some path.

[ischasny]

#373