style: apply nix fmt to documentation and project files

[kalbasit]

This commit applies project-wide formatting using 'nix fmt', mostly affecting
documentation files and internal metadata. No functional changes included.

Part of #322

[kalbasit]

• style: apply nix fmt to documentation and project files #671 👈 (View in Graphite)
• feat: add CLI and Helm configuration for CDC and S3 #670
• feat: integrate CDC with cache and implement chunk GC #669
• feat: add S3 storage support for chunks #668
• refactor: extract S3 test helpers for reuse #676
• refactor: move S3 configuration to its own package #675
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @kalbasit, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request standardizes the formatting of documentation and internal metadata files across the project. The primary goal is to enhance readability and maintainability by enforcing a consistent style, ensuring that all textual content adheres to a predefined format without altering any underlying logic or behavior.

Highlights

• Documentation Formatting: Applied project-wide formatting using 'nix fmt' to all documentation files, primarily converting list item markers from hyphens to asterisks and adjusting indentation for consistency.
• Metadata File Reordering: Reordered entries within 'docs/!!!meta.json', specifically adjusting 'internalLink' values and positions, and 'shareAlias' positions, likely as a side effect of the formatting tool.
• No Functional Changes: Confirmed that these changes are purely stylistic and do not introduce any functional modifications to the codebase.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request applies project-wide formatting using 'nix fmt', which primarily affects documentation files and internal metadata. While most changes are stylistic, I've identified a couple of potential issues in docs/!!!meta.json where the formatter seems to have introduced duplicate position values. This could cause problems for the documentation system that consumes this file. My review includes suggestions to fix these duplicate positions. The provided rule regarding WebSearch does not apply to these comments.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 79.16%. Comparing base (a24af8e) to head (9de8311).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #671   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.16%   79.16%           
=======================================
  Files           2        2           
  Lines         456      456           
=======================================
  Hits          361      361           
  Misses         83       83           
  Partials       12       12           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[dosubot]

Related Documentation

No published documentation to review for changes on this repository.

Write your first living document

^{How did I do? Any feedback?}