Skip to content

Conversation

@niuchaoyu
Copy link

This PR adds a reference to the GIP-MI reliability solution discussed in kubeedge/kubeedge#6607.

@kubeedge-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Welcome @niuchaoyu! It looks like this is your first PR to kubeedge/examples 🎉

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @niuchaoyu, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request integrates documentation for the GIP-MI reliability framework, providing an example reference for software aging prediction and node rejuvenation within the KubeEdge ecosystem. It serves as an introductory guide to the framework's core components and directs users to the complete implementation and related discussions.

Highlights

  • New Reliability Example: Introduces a new README.md file under reliability/GIP-MI-demo/ that outlines the GIP-MI framework for software aging prediction and node rejuvenation within KubeEdge.
  • GIP-MI Framework Details: The README.md details the GIP-MI framework's features, including the GCN-Informer model for prediction, ParNet for state determination, and MOEA/D-IFM for task offloading.
  • External Reference: A link to the full implementation repository and a reference to KubeEdge Issue #6607 are provided for further details.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@kubeedge-bot kubeedge-bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 6, 2026
@kubeedge-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: niuchaoyu
To complete the pull request process, please assign fisherxu after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @fisherxu in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a README file for the GIP-MI reliability framework example. The content is clear and provides a good overview. I have a couple of suggestions to improve the readability and user experience of the markdown file by making references into clickable links with descriptive text.

Copy link
Contributor

@fujitatomoya fujitatomoya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you for your contribution interest.

actually i have concerns about accepting this PR: (i am not a maintainer of this repository, but this could be applied in general for oss project management.)

  • External code reference: The kubeedge/examples repository maintains example code directly, not references to external repositories. This ensures maintainability and that examples remain functional.
  • Maintainability: Code hosted in personal repositories can break or disappear without notice, and maintainers cannot fix issues.
  • Scope: Examples here typically demonstrate core KubeEdge features (device mappers, edge applications, etc.).

what do you think... ? @niuchaoyu @Shelley-BaoYue

@niuchaoyu
Copy link
Author

thank you for your contribution interest.

actually i have concerns about accepting this PR: (i am not a maintainer of this repository, but this could be applied in general for oss project management.)

  • External code reference: The kubeedge/examples repository maintains example code directly, not references to external repositories. This ensures maintainability and that examples remain functional.
  • Maintainability: Code hosted in personal repositories can break or disappear without notice, and maintainers cannot fix issues.
  • Scope: Examples here typically demonstrate core KubeEdge features (device mappers, edge applications, etc.).

what do you think... ? @niuchaoyu @Shelley-BaoYue

Hi @fujitatomoya, thank you for the feedback. You are absolutely right.

I agree that relying on an external repository is not ideal for long-term maintainability and consistency.
Since the source code itself is lightweight and fits within the repository scope, I will update this PR to include the actual implementation code (Python scripts and configuration files) directly into this folder, rather than just a reference.

I will push the updates shortly. Thanks for guiding me to follow the best practices!

@kubeedge-bot kubeedge-bot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 10, 2026
Signed-off-by: niuchaoyu <411654689@qq.com>
@kubeedge-bot kubeedge-bot removed the do-not-merge/invalid-commit-message Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid commit message. label Jan 14, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants