Skip to content

Monorepo implementation, resolves FRONT-597#1498

Draft
arentant wants to merge 426 commits intodevfrom
dev-monorepo
Draft

Monorepo implementation, resolves FRONT-597#1498
arentant wants to merge 426 commits intodevfrom
dev-monorepo

Conversation

@arentant
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 24, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
layerswap-monorepo-bridge Ready Ready Preview Jan 23, 2026 3:36pm
widget-playground Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jan 23, 2026 3:36pm
4 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
layerswap-dynamic-example Ignored Ignored Preview Jan 23, 2026 3:36pm
layerswap-explorer-monorepo Ignored Ignored Preview Jan 23, 2026 3:36pm
layerswap-explorer-monorepo (sandbox) Ignored Ignored Jan 23, 2026 3:36pm
layerswapapp Ignored Ignored Preview Jan 23, 2026 3:36pm

Request Review

@arentant arentant changed the title Monorepo initial implementation Monorepo initial implementation, resolves FRONT-597 Sep 24, 2025
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 29, 2025

Deployment failed with the following error:

The `vercel.json` schema validation failed with the following message: should NOT have additional property `rootDirectory`

Learn More: https://vercel.com/docs/concepts/projects/project-configuration

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 29, 2025

Deployment failed with the following error:

The `vercel.json` schema validation failed with the following message: should NOT have additional property `projects`

Learn More: https://vercel.com/docs/concepts/projects/project-configuration

@arentant arentant changed the title Monorepo initial implementation, resolves FRONT-597 Monorepo implementation, resolves FRONT-597 Jan 15, 2026
…jects in multiple hooks and update type definition
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants