Skip to content

Conversation

@justforlxz
Copy link
Member

@justforlxz justforlxz commented Jul 3, 2025

cannot build on Archlinux

Log:

Summary by Sourcery

Bug Fixes:

  • Include QJsonValue header in helper.hpp to fix build failure due to missing symbol definitions

cannot build on Archlinux

Log:
@justforlxz justforlxz requested review from 18202781743 and BLumia July 3, 2025 07:29
@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Jul 3, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

Addresses build failures by adding the missing QJsonValue header to restore compilation on Archlinux.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Added missing QJsonValue include
  • Inserted #include <QJsonValue> into helper.hpp
dconfig-center/common/helper.hpp

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @justforlxz - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

这个提交的改动主要是添加了对 <QJsonValue> 头文件的引用。从代码的改动来看,没有明显的语法错误或逻辑问题。但是,我们可以从代码质量和性能的角度提出一些改进建议:

  1. 代码质量

    • 确保添加 <QJsonValue> 头文件是有必要的,如果这个头文件是用于新的功能或修复现有功能,那么这个改动是合理的。如果没有实际使用到 QJsonValue,建议移除这个引用以避免不必要的依赖。
  2. 代码性能

    • 添加头文件本身不会对性能产生直接影响,但是需要确保在添加这个头文件后,没有引入任何不必要的依赖或资源消耗。
  3. 代码安全

    • 没有涉及到安全性的改动,因为这个提交只是添加了一个头文件的引用。
  4. 其他建议

    • 如果这个头文件的引用是为了支持新的功能,建议在提交信息中说明添加这个头文件的具体原因和目的。
    • 如果这个改动是临时的,建议在提交信息中标记这是一个临时改动,并在未来的提交中移除这个头文件的引用。

综上所述,这个提交的改动是合理的,但是需要确保添加 <QJsonValue> 头文件是有必要的,并且没有引入任何不必要的依赖或资源消耗。如果这个改动是临时的,建议在提交信息中说明这一点。

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 18202781743, justforlxz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@18202781743 18202781743 merged commit 7d22e12 into linuxdeepin:master Jul 3, 2025
18 of 20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants