-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 361
Extend Key Length #2242
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
echeipesh
merged 25 commits into
locationtech:master
from
jamesmcclain:feature/key-extension
Dec 7, 2017
Merged
Extend Key Length #2242
echeipesh
merged 25 commits into
locationtech:master
from
jamesmcclain:feature/key-extension
Dec 7, 2017
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
186170f to
702f828
Compare
cb3010a to
fa6549f
Compare
fa6549f to
fd9ddc8
Compare
The range length is still expressed as a `Double`, the maximum bin size is still a `Long`. Signed-off-by: James McClain <jmcclain@azavea.com>
The range lengths are still expressed as a `Long` values.
Note: `Long.MaxValue` has been changed to `BigInt(-1)`.
Note: `Long.MaxValue` has been changed to `BigInt(-1)`.
Account for differences between `LongWritable` and `BytesWritable`.
An key length of at least eight bytes is ensured in `AccumuloKeyEncoder`. That was because keys of one byte (in the unit tests) were not working -- extra zero bytes were being mysteriously added. Behavior with keys of more than 8 bytes is unknown.
Key length still capped at 64-bits, needs custom coded.
fd9ddc8 to
d131044
Compare
0edd55b to
5a7f177
Compare
echeipesh
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2017
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Is there a Hadoop Collections API bug?Not seen for a whileBigIntiffbigint" codec. That codec will need to be able to read keys serialized by the original "Longiffbigint" codec in order to be able to read old layers.org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Bytesfor theLong->Array[Byte]conversion. The machinery in this PR usesBigInt.toByteArraythen pads to at least 8 bytes. See the note about Accumulo backward compatibility above.See also locationtech/sfcurve#18, feature/geowave-index
Fixes #2238