Skip to content

Conversation

@Maijin
Copy link
Contributor

@Maijin Maijin commented Jan 19, 2026

  • Disabling the rule cache during linting ensures validation runs against the current state of files on disk rather than stale cached data, effectively preventing false positives when rules are renamed or modified.

Checklist

  • No CHANGELOG update needed
  • No new tests needed
  • No documentation update needed

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @Maijin, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request improves the reliability of the linting process by ensuring that rule caching is explicitly disabled during linting. This prevents the use of outdated cached rule definitions, thereby eliminating a source of false positives and ensuring that linting results accurately reflect the current state of the codebase.

Highlights

  • Linting Accuracy: The pull request disables rule caching specifically during the linting process to ensure that validation always uses the most current state of files on disk.
  • Preventing False Positives: This change addresses potential false positives that could arise from stale cached data, especially when linting rules are renamed or modified.
  • Cache Control: A new "enable_cache" argument has been introduced in the "get_rules_from_cli" function, allowing explicit control over whether rule caching is active.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request disables rule caching during linting to prevent false positives from stale cache data. The implementation correctly adds a mechanism to disable caching and uses it in the lint script. I've added a couple of suggestions: one to improve code conciseness in capa/main.py and another to maintain consistency in CHANGELOG.md. Overall, this is a good and necessary fix.

@williballenthin
Copy link
Collaborator

have you encountered this being an issue @Maijin? i believe our rule caching logic checks hashes/timestamps of the rule files and should therefore cache edits.

@Maijin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Maijin commented Jan 19, 2026

Yeah basically when I was renaming the files (via Antigravity), the linter kept using the old names and failing and It took a while to figure out that it was the cache issue. Deleting the cache files fixed it so I'm suggesting this PR to completely remove this issue.

@Maijin Maijin force-pushed the fix/lint-disable-cache branch from 1109a17 to 96f76b8 Compare January 19, 2026 09:49
Copy link
Collaborator

@mr-tz mr-tz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks, just two suggestions regarding the documentation

@Maijin Maijin force-pushed the fix/lint-disable-cache branch from 96f76b8 to 218593e Compare January 20, 2026 09:48
@Maijin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Maijin commented Jan 20, 2026

@mr-tz done

Copy link
Collaborator

@mr-tz mr-tz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants