Skip to content

Conversation

@PadmanavaParui
Copy link

fixed the issues in calculator.py

@entelligence-ai-pr-reviews
Copy link

🔒 Entelligence AI Vulnerability Scanner

No security vulnerabilities found!

Your code passed our comprehensive security analysis.

📊 Files Analyzed: 1 files


# ISSUE 3: This function doesn't handle division by zero properly
if b == 0:
return float('inf') # BUG: Should raise an exception instead
return "Cannot divide by zero" # BUG: Should raise an exception instead

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

correctness: divide returns a string on division by zero instead of raising an exception, violating expected contract and causing inconsistent return types.

🤖 AI Agent Prompt for Cursor/Windsurf

📋 Copy this prompt to your AI coding assistant (Cursor, Windsurf, etc.) to get help fixing this issue

In calculator.py, lines 15-15, the divide function returns a string when dividing by zero instead of raising an exception. This leads to inconsistent return types and violates standard division contract. Change the code to raise a ZeroDivisionError instead of returning a string.
📝 Committable Code Suggestion

‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
return "Cannot divide by zero" # BUG: Should raise an exception instead
if b == 0:
raise ZeroDivisionError("division by zero")

# ISSUE 5: This function has recursion issues
if n < 0:
return -1 # BUG: Should raise ValueError for negative inputs
return "Value Error" # BUG: Should raise ValueError for negative inputs

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

correctness: factorial returns a string for negative input instead of raising ValueError, leading to inconsistent return types and silent failures.

🤖 AI Agent Prompt for Cursor/Windsurf

📋 Copy this prompt to your AI coding assistant (Cursor, Windsurf, etc.) to get help fixing this issue

In calculator.py, lines 25-25, the factorial function returns a string for negative input instead of raising a ValueError. This causes inconsistent return types and hides errors. Update the code to raise a ValueError when n < 0.
📝 Committable Code Suggestion

‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
return "Value Error" # BUG: Should raise ValueError for negative inputs
if n < 0:
raise ValueError("factorial() not defined for negative values")

Comment on lines +33 to +35
print(False)
else:
prime = True

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

correctness: is_prime does not return a value for n <= 1, causing undefined behavior and potential runtime errors.

🤖 AI Agent Prompt for Cursor/Windsurf

📋 Copy this prompt to your AI coding assistant (Cursor, Windsurf, etc.) to get help fixing this issue

In calculator.py, lines 33-35, the is_prime function prints False for n <= 1 but does not return a value, leading to undefined behavior. Change the code to return False instead of printing.
📝 Committable Code Suggestion

‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
print(False)
else:
prime = True
if n <= 1:
return False
else:

else:
prime = True
for i in range(2, int(n**1/2) + 1):
if n % i == 0:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

performance: is_prime uses a loop from 2 to int(n**1/2) + 1 but n**1/2 is always 1 for n > 1, causing O(n) time instead of O(sqrt(n)), which is inefficient for large n.

🤖 AI Agent Prompt for Cursor/Windsurf

📋 Copy this prompt to your AI coding assistant (Cursor, Windsurf, etc.) to get help fixing this issue

In calculator.py, line 37, the `is_prime` function uses `int(n**1/2)` which always evaluates to 1 for n > 1, resulting in an inefficient O(n) primality check. Change it to `int(n**0.5)` to achieve O(sqrt(n)) time complexity for large n.
📝 Committable Code Suggestion

‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
if n % i == 0:
for i in range(2, int(n**0.5) + 1):

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant