-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
fixed the issues #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
🔒 Entelligence AI Vulnerability Scanner ✅ No security vulnerabilities found! Your code passed our comprehensive security analysis. 📊 Files Analyzed: 1 files |
| # ISSUE 3: This function doesn't handle division by zero properly | ||
| if b == 0: | ||
| return float('inf') # BUG: Should raise an exception instead | ||
| return "Cannot divide by zero" # BUG: Should raise an exception instead |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
correctness: divide returns a string on division by zero instead of raising an exception, violating expected contract and causing inconsistent return types.
🤖 AI Agent Prompt for Cursor/Windsurf
📋 Copy this prompt to your AI coding assistant (Cursor, Windsurf, etc.) to get help fixing this issue
In calculator.py, lines 15-15, the divide function returns a string when dividing by zero instead of raising an exception. This leads to inconsistent return types and violates standard division contract. Change the code to raise a ZeroDivisionError instead of returning a string.
📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| return "Cannot divide by zero" # BUG: Should raise an exception instead | |
| if b == 0: | |
| raise ZeroDivisionError("division by zero") |
| # ISSUE 5: This function has recursion issues | ||
| if n < 0: | ||
| return -1 # BUG: Should raise ValueError for negative inputs | ||
| return "Value Error" # BUG: Should raise ValueError for negative inputs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
correctness: factorial returns a string for negative input instead of raising ValueError, leading to inconsistent return types and silent failures.
🤖 AI Agent Prompt for Cursor/Windsurf
📋 Copy this prompt to your AI coding assistant (Cursor, Windsurf, etc.) to get help fixing this issue
In calculator.py, lines 25-25, the factorial function returns a string for negative input instead of raising a ValueError. This causes inconsistent return types and hides errors. Update the code to raise a ValueError when n < 0.
📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| return "Value Error" # BUG: Should raise ValueError for negative inputs | |
| if n < 0: | |
| raise ValueError("factorial() not defined for negative values") |
| print(False) | ||
| else: | ||
| prime = True |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
correctness: is_prime does not return a value for n <= 1, causing undefined behavior and potential runtime errors.
🤖 AI Agent Prompt for Cursor/Windsurf
📋 Copy this prompt to your AI coding assistant (Cursor, Windsurf, etc.) to get help fixing this issue
In calculator.py, lines 33-35, the is_prime function prints False for n <= 1 but does not return a value, leading to undefined behavior. Change the code to return False instead of printing.
📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| print(False) | |
| else: | |
| prime = True | |
| if n <= 1: | |
| return False | |
| else: |
| else: | ||
| prime = True | ||
| for i in range(2, int(n**1/2) + 1): | ||
| if n % i == 0: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
performance: is_prime uses a loop from 2 to int(n**1/2) + 1 but n**1/2 is always 1 for n > 1, causing O(n) time instead of O(sqrt(n)), which is inefficient for large n.
🤖 AI Agent Prompt for Cursor/Windsurf
📋 Copy this prompt to your AI coding assistant (Cursor, Windsurf, etc.) to get help fixing this issue
In calculator.py, line 37, the `is_prime` function uses `int(n**1/2)` which always evaluates to 1 for n > 1, resulting in an inefficient O(n) primality check. Change it to `int(n**0.5)` to achieve O(sqrt(n)) time complexity for large n.
📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| if n % i == 0: | |
| for i in range(2, int(n**0.5) + 1): |
fixed the issues in calculator.py