Skip to content

remove invalid JS according to newest spec #679

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
Archkon wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

remove invalid JS according to newest spec #679

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion js-quirks.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -361,7 +361,6 @@ to make it a little less confusing.)

```js
for (async of => {};;) {}
for (async of []) {}
Copy link
Collaborator

@arai-a arai-a Sep 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The previous and the next paragraphs are talking about this code example, with "both", "first", and "second" words.
Also, this is used as an example of how LR(1) doesn't fit, where "async" and "of" become identifier or contextual-keyword depending on the following token. So, just removing the second line here doesn't work well.

So, for example these paragraphs should be replaced with some other examples that explains how LR(1) doesn't fit, or maybe just be removed if there's no other such.
Maybe something around for (using ... could be used.

```

In the first line, `async` is a keyword and `of` is an identifier;
Expand Down