Skip to content

Comments

docs: add link to time-tracker#3

Merged
bambam955 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
ae-add-link
Sep 24, 2025
Merged

docs: add link to time-tracker#3
bambam955 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
ae-add-link

Conversation

@Pertempto
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Pertempto Pertempto marked this pull request as ready for review September 24, 2025 19:49
@github-actions
Copy link

Summary of Changes

  • Added a new LinkCard for the "time-tracker" project to the Open Source Projects section in src/content/docs/index.mdx.

Overall Feedback

This is a clean and straightforward addition! 👍

@Pertempto Pertempto requested a review from bambam955 September 24, 2025 19:51
@Pertempto
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think this repo is important enough that i set required approval to 1 for PRs.

@bambam955
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah I would definitely agree. I think that should be the default for all of our open-source repos honestly

@bambam955 bambam955 merged commit 64e5676 into main Sep 24, 2025
1 check passed
@bambam955 bambam955 deleted the ae-add-link branch September 24, 2025 19:56
@Pertempto
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pertempto commented Sep 24, 2025

I think that should be the default for all of our open-source repos honestly

Yeah, I would generally agree. However, it seems that required code review on brand new projects that one person is focused on fleshing out can just become a bottleneck.

@Pertempto
Copy link
Contributor Author

once mrs-sdk-qt and time-tracker are to a state that they seem "usable" or maybe "MVP", then we should require approval. time-tracker is pretty close, just needs docker container.

@bambam955
Copy link
Contributor

I think that should be the default for all of our open-source repos honestly

Yeah, I would generally agree. However, it seems that required code review on brand new projects that one person is focused on fleshing out can just become a bottleneck.

Okay fair point 👍 but let's lean towards more review rather than less as long as it's not a bottleneck

@Pertempto
Copy link
Contributor Author

yeah totally. I just think code review is unnecessary in the prototyping stage.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants