Skip to content

Conversation

@rsill-neo4j
Copy link
Contributor

@rsill-neo4j rsill-neo4j commented Oct 17, 2025

This should be the same as #1391

The changes from #1325 have been incorporated.

I was unable to push to the fork 1391 was created from, that's why i raised a new PR

ToDo (moved over from the other PR, not sure how relevant they still are):

  • Clarify graph types wrt GQL appendix
  • Replace 2025.xx with actual month of release (currently not confirmed)

Related PRs:

@Hunterness Hunterness self-assigned this Oct 20, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some of the show constraint command results lost their new columns as the vector constraint rows were added :(

rsill-neo4j and others added 2 commits October 21, 2025 13:17
Co-authored-by: Therese Magnusson <therese.magnusson@neo4j.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comments on the updates

Copy link
Collaborator

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Answering the classification questions as well as adding the vector property type constraints to the setup

Co-authored-by: Therese Magnusson <therese.magnusson@neo4j.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

More comments on table formatting/alignment

Copy link
Collaborator

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No new comments 🎉

Now we just have to keep it up to date while waiting for graph types to go public/GA/beta/what the plan now is

Co-authored-by: Therese Magnusson <therese.magnusson@neo4j.com>
@Hunterness Hunterness mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2025
In Aura, graph types are enabled by default.
In self-managed Neo4j, graph types are disabled by default.
Use the internal setting `internal.dbms.graph_types.enabled=true` to enable it.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't this just internal.dbms.graph_types=true? 🤔

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that could very well be the case :) - this was from brain brump after seeing it briefly in the document, and it's something yet to be double-checked

In Aura, graph types are enabled by default.
In self-managed Neo4j, graph types are disabled by default.
Use the internal setting `internal.dbms.graph_types.enabled=true` to enable it.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Use the internal setting `internal.dbms.graph_types.enabled=true` to enable it.
Use the internal setting `internal.dbms.graph_types=true` to enable it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants