Skip to content

chore: update readme to use rwz 0.3.0 beta1#86

Merged
jchiarulli merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
update-readme-to-use-rwz-0.3.0-beta1
Jan 3, 2026
Merged

chore: update readme to use rwz 0.3.0 beta1#86
jchiarulli merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
update-readme-to-use-rwz-0.3.0-beta1

Conversation

@jchiarulli
Copy link
Member

@jchiarulli jchiarulli commented Jan 3, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated README with beta1 release verification details, including GPG signature and SHA512 checksum verification instructions.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@jchiarulli jchiarulli self-assigned this Jan 3, 2026
@jchiarulli jchiarulli added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 3, 2026
@jchiarulli jchiarulli moved this to Backlog in πŸ§™ Relay Wizard Jan 3, 2026
@jchiarulli jchiarulli moved this from Backlog to Done in πŸ§™ Relay Wizard Jan 3, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 3, 2026

πŸ“ Walkthrough

Walkthrough

README.md was updated to reflect version changes from alpha5 to beta1 across GPG verification commands, SHA512 checksums, signature blocks, and filenames in the verification documentation examples.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation version update
README.md
Updated verification references from alpha5 to beta1: GPG signature block, SHA512 verification command, filename references (rwz-0.3.0-alpha5-manifest.sha512sum.asc β†’ rwz-0.3.0-beta1-manifest.sha512sum.asc), signature dates, and tarball indicators.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

Poem

🐰 From alpha5 to beta1 we hop,
Version bumps that never stop!
SHA512s and GPG keys align,
Documentation now looks fine! ✨

Pre-merge checks

βœ… Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check βœ… Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check βœ… Passed The title clearly and concisely summarizes the main change: updating README verification references from alpha5 to beta1 version.
Docstring Coverage βœ… Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

πŸ“œ Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e48a806 and 23b0a06.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)

120-134: SHA512 verification examples correctly updated to beta1.

The SHA512 verification commands and expected output have been consistently updated to reference the beta1 release artifacts.


87-103: No issues found β€” all alpha5 references have been successfully replaced with beta1 throughout the documentation.

The version update is complete and consistent across all verification examples.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❀️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@jchiarulli jchiarulli merged commit aeb7674 into master Jan 3, 2026
4 of 5 checks passed
@jchiarulli jchiarulli deleted the update-readme-to-use-rwz-0.3.0-beta1 branch January 3, 2026 03:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant