rc: switch to 9fronts source #142
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ourcetree, and more or less follows 9fronts changes
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
as discussed on irc, I switched our rc to a repo similar to upstream 9front.
there were couple patches missing in this repo, which existed in 9front, so I pulled in those.
I took the liberty and fixed a warning about mains return type, as plan 9 returns a string, and not an int.
I omited the first existing patch, because the sources were too different for me to easily port over.
if you feel different about the patches here, feel free to fix it when merging, or send them to me, and ill add them to the pr.