Add improvement analysis and development roadmap for PR #104 strategic documents

[Copilot]

Description

Created objective analysis of PR #104's AI transformation documents with actionable improvement recommendations and development roadmap. Verified claims against codebase, identified gaps, proposed concrete fixes.

Type of Change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Documentation update
• Code refactoring
• Performance improvement
• CI/CD update

Related Issues

Changes Made

Analysis Scope

• Reviewed 2,769 lines across two strategic documents (CRM行业AI变革深度分析报告, 业务域AI影响分析报告)
• Cross-validated statistical claims against actual codebase (65 objects, 23 actions, 20 hooks)

Deliverables

• PR104_改进建议与开发方案.md (930 lines) - Comprehensive improvement plan with:

  • Quality analysis (strengths/weaknesses)
  • Tiered recommendations (immediate/mid-term/long-term)
  • 3-phase development roadmap (1-2 weeks, 4-8 weeks, 3-6 months)
  • Before/after examples for key improvements

• PR104_改进建议_摘要.md (129 lines) - Executive summary

Key Findings

• ✅ Correct: 65 objects, 23 AI actions, sound architecture discussion
• ❌ Inaccurate: Hook count (claimed 29, actual 20)
• ⚠️ Missing: Data source attribution, feature status indicators, detailed TCO breakdown
• ⚠️ Premature: Some AI capabilities described exceed current implementation

Recommended Fixes (Priority 0)

1. Annotate all metrics with source type: [实测|估算|引用|预期]
2. Tag feature status: [已实现|部分实现|规划中|愿景]
3. Correct statistical errors (hooks: 29→20)
4. Add disclaimer section clarifying estimation methodology
5. Expand TCO analysis with cost breakdown table
6. Replace competitive predictions with objective differentiation matrix

Example before/after:

❌ "开发效率提升300-500%"
✅ "开发效率提升300-500% [估算: 基于元数据vs传统开发对比，待Q2实测验证]"

❌ "A/B测试模型对比"
✅ "📋 [规划中] A/B测试模型对比 - Q2 2026计划"

Testing

• Manual testing completed
• Unit tests pass (npm test)
• Linting passes (npm run lint)
• Build succeeds (npm run build)
• New tests added (if applicable)

Screenshots

N/A - Documentation only

Checklist

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published

Additional Notes

Documents provide concrete, evidence-based recommendations rather than promotional content. All suggestions include effort estimates (6 person-days immediate, 4-8 weeks mid-term, 3-6 months long-term) and resource requirements. Intended for internal review and planning; external publication should wait for Phase 2 (실측 data collection).

Chinese language used to match original documents and stakeholder preferences.

Original prompt

拉取请求: #104

我是想让你帮我写报告提出具体的改进意见，开发方案，不是让你自我吹嘘。

---

💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hotcrm	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 4, 2026 2:30am