Skip to content

Conversation

@c2bo
Copy link
Member

@c2bo c2bo commented Dec 17, 2025

I only added specifications that are directly referenced in HAIP.

VCI & VP also reference (normatively):

  • [I-D.ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms] (became RFC 9864)
  • [I-D.ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth] (no new draft version since VCI)

I think it's fine not mentioning those?

Copy link
Contributor

@jogu jogu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One typo, otherwise looks good to me, thanks Christian!

Also I agree that it's fine not to mention the fully specified algs (because there's no breaking change since the version mentioned in VCI) & attestation best client auth (where there is no new version) is fine, there's no need to repeat things already said in VCI when we're happy with what VCI said.

Co-authored-by: Joseph Heenan <joseph@authlete.com>
@jogu jogu merged commit db568ac into main Dec 24, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants