Skip to content

Conversation

@jacob-anders
Copy link

No description provided.

@jacob-anders
Copy link
Author

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 9, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dtantsur and hroyrh September 9, 2025 11:18
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 9, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhjanders
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign zaneb for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jacob-anders jacob-anders force-pushed the servicing-backout-light branch 3 times, most recently from 59c1c10 to cf0df59 Compare September 11, 2025 05:41
@jacob-anders jacob-anders force-pushed the servicing-backout-light branch 7 times, most recently from fad302d to bb35cb4 Compare September 22, 2025 06:32
@jacob-anders jacob-anders force-pushed the servicing-backout-light branch from 306e5f7 to 655cd00 Compare September 23, 2025 05:13
This change addresses the issue of lack of clear pathway from recovering
from a failed servicing operation. If serivcing operation is in progress
or in the failed state and the user adjusts hfs.spec and/or
hfc.spec (or removes the specs entirely) to ensure that ChangeDetected
condition becomes false, servicing is aborted.

Generated-By: Claude Code Sonnet 4
Signed-off-by: Jacob Anders <janders@redhat.com>
@jacob-anders jacob-anders force-pushed the servicing-backout-light branch from 2c8ec32 to 325ee71 Compare September 24, 2025 04:57
This change resolves the issue where removing hfc.spec results in
ChangeDetected condition being set to True in case status.updates field
is also present

Assisted-By: Claude Code Sonnet 4
Signed-off-by: Jacob Anders <janders@redhat.com>
@jacob-anders jacob-anders force-pushed the servicing-backout-light branch from 325ee71 to de007d3 Compare September 24, 2025 05:10
@jacob-anders jacob-anders force-pushed the servicing-backout-light branch from 694122e to 9f86944 Compare September 24, 2025 11:50
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 30, 2025

@rhjanders: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack a2078c3 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn a2078c3 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jacob-anders
Copy link
Author

hmm this didn't quite work, uncommanded abort still occured:

grep abort[devscripts@u640-u04 dev-scripts]$ grep aborting bmo.log
{"level":"info","ts":1759401135.9130936,"logger":"provisioner.ironic","msg":"aborting servicing because no firmware changes detected","host":"openshift-machine-api~ostest-extraworker-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":1759401135.9131043,"logger":"provisioner.ironic","msg":"clearing maintenance flag before aborting servicing","host":"openshift-machine-api~ostest-extraworker-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":1759401140.9112108,"logger":"provisioner.ironic","msg":"aborting servicing because no firmware changes detected","host":"openshift-machine-api~ostest-extraworker-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":1759401140.9112153,"logger":"provisioner.ironic","msg":"aborting servicing due to removal of spec.updates/spec.settings","host":"openshift-machine-api~ostest-extraworker-1"}
[devscripts@u640-u04 dev-scripts]$

To be investigated further

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants