Skip to content

Conversation

@MarSik
Copy link
Contributor

@MarSik MarSik commented Jul 14, 2025

Replaces the failing cherry pick from #1358 (comment)

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 14, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@MarSik: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-52853, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target either version "4.18." or "openshift-4.18.", but it targets "4.20.0" instead
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is Verified instead
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-52853 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.19.0, 4.19.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Replaces the failing cherry pick from #1358 (comment)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@MarSik
Copy link
Contributor Author

MarSik commented Jul 14, 2025

/jira cherry-pick release-4.18

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dagrayvid and ffromani July 14, 2025 11:04
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 14, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: MarSik

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 14, 2025
@MarSik
Copy link
Contributor Author

MarSik commented Jul 14, 2025

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Jul 14, 2025
@MarSik
Copy link
Contributor Author

MarSik commented Jul 14, 2025

/retitle OCPBUGS-59290Do not add iommu.passthrough to ARM by default [4.18]

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title OCPBUGS-52853: Do not add iommu.passthrough to ARM by default OCPBUGS-59290Do not add iommu.passthrough to ARM by default [4.18] Jul 14, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 14, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@MarSik: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a jira issue, add 'XYZ-NNN:' to the title of this pull request and request another refresh with /jira refresh.

Details

In response to this:

Replaces the failing cherry pick from #1358 (comment)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@MarSik
Copy link
Contributor Author

MarSik commented Jul 14, 2025

/retitle OCPBUGS-59290: Do not add iommu.passthrough to ARM by default [4.18]

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title OCPBUGS-59290Do not add iommu.passthrough to ARM by default [4.18] OCPBUGS-59290: Do not add iommu.passthrough to ARM by default [4.18] Jul 14, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 14, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@MarSik: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59290, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target either version "4.18." or "openshift-4.18.", but it targets "4.20.0" instead
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-52853 to target a version in 4.19.0, 4.19.z, but it targets "4.20.0" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Replaces the failing cherry pick from #1358 (comment)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@MarSik
Copy link
Contributor Author

MarSik commented Jul 14, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@MarSik: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59290, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58402 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@MarSik
Copy link
Contributor Author

MarSik commented Jul 16, 2025

/retest

@mrniranjan
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 16, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@mrniranjan: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59290, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.18.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58402 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-58402 targets the "4.19.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.19.0, 4.19.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @mrniranjan

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from mrniranjan July 16, 2025 14:31
@mrniranjan
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-hypershift

@yanirq
Copy link
Contributor

yanirq commented Jul 30, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 29, 2025
@mrniranjan
Copy link
Contributor

/verified by @mrniranjan

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Nov 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@mrniranjan: This PR has been marked as verified by @mrniranjan.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @mrniranjan

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@MarSik
Copy link
Contributor Author

MarSik commented Nov 19, 2025

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD eb5caaf and 2 for PR HEAD a152a62 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 19, 2025

@MarSik: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-pao a152a62 link true /test e2e-gcp-pao
ci/prow/e2e-hypershift-pao a152a62 link true /test e2e-hypershift-pao

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Dec 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants