-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
OCPBUGS-63321: Watch MCP changes including spec and labels #1425
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
MCP edits are properly watched by the runtime, but the predicate only reacted to changes in the MCP.status section. This meant we missed label and selector changes and never reconciled when those were changed.
|
@MarSik: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63321, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@MarSik: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63321, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Tal-or
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
|
I would add an integration/e2e test to avoid future regression |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: MarSik, Tal-or The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest-required |
|
/retest |
|
/retest |
|
/verified by @SargunNarula |
|
@SargunNarula: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/retest-required |
|
@MarSik: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@MarSik: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63321 Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63321 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/cherry-pick release-4.20 |
|
@MarSik: new pull request created: #1434 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
Fix included in accepted release 4.21.0-0.nightly-2025-11-22-193140 |
MCP edits are properly watched by the runtime, but the predicate only reacted to changes in the MCP.status section. This meant we missed label and selector changes and never reconciled when those were changed.