OCPBUGS-62014: rorfs for cacheless lacks write access to /tmp/ to generate cache

[perdasilva]

Backport of fix brought in by #1088 fixed upstream by operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager#3640

• rorfs for cacheless lacks write access to /tmp/ to generate cache

---

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: f63134899a07118ca121ca9f17691af90896eb2b

[openshift-ci-robot]

@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62014, which is invalid:

• release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
• expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62014 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.21.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Backport of fix brought in by #1088 fixed upstream by operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager#3640

• rorfs for cacheless lacks write access to /tmp/ to generate cache

---

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: f63134899a07118ca121ca9f17691af90896eb2b

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: perdasilva

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• DOWNSTREAM_OWNERS [perdasilva]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[perdasilva]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62014, which is invalid:

• release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61085 to target a version in 4.21.0, but it targets "4.21" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[perdasilva]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62014, which is invalid:

• release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61085 to target a version in 4.21.0, but it targets "4.21" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[perdasilva]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62014, which is invalid:

• release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[perdasilva]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62014, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.20.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.z)
• bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
• release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
• dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61085 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
• dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61085 targets the "4.21.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.21.0
• bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @Xia-Zhao-rh

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[Xia-Zhao-rh]

/retest

[openshift-ci]

@perdasilva: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[Xia-Zhao-rh]

/verified by @Xia-Zhao-rh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@Xia-Zhao-rh: This PR has been marked as verified by @Xia-Zhao-rh.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @Xia-Zhao-rh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[perdasilva]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

@perdasilva: you cannot LGTM your own PR.

Details

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[oceanc80]

/lgtm
/label backport-risk-assessed

[openshift-ci-robot]

@perdasilva: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62014
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62014 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

Backport of fix brought in by #1088 fixed upstream by operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager#3640

• rorfs for cacheless lacks write access to /tmp/ to generate cache

---

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: f63134899a07118ca121ca9f17691af90896eb2b

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.