OCPBUGS-67301: Fix TOCTOU race condition in ensureInstallPlan (#3682)

[perdasilva]

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: ce26d16fb9c59f03cc234b803fe8d3e40a3c09c0

[openshift-ci-robot]

@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67301, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target either version "4.17." or "openshift-4.17.", but it targets "4.18.z" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: ce26d16fb9c59f03cc234b803fe8d3e40a3c09c0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: perdasilva

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• DOWNSTREAM_OWNERS [perdasilva]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[perdasilva]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67301, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target either version "4.17." or "openshift-4.17.", but it targets "4.18.z" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[perdasilva]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67301, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.17.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.z)
• bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
• release note text is set and does not match the template
• dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65700 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
• dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65700 targets the "4.18.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.18.0, 4.18.z
• bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (jiazha@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

@perdasilva: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[jianzhangbjz]

/verified by pass

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jianzhangbjz: This PR has been marked as verified by pass.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by pass

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[perdasilva]

@jianzhangbjz could you please have a look? I think this bug was created against 4.17 as well. So, I pulled down your fix =D

[jianzhangbjz]

Hi @perdasilva , it looks good to me.
/lgtm
/backport-risk-assessed

[oceanc80]

/label backport-risk-assessed

[openshift-ci-robot]

@perdasilva: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67301
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67301 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: ce26d16fb9c59f03cc234b803fe8d3e40a3c09c0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.