Adding dockerfile changes for ppc64le#59
Adding dockerfile changes for ppc64le#59ghatwala wants to merge 1 commit intoorientechnologies:masterfrom
Conversation
My intent is to have "ppc64le" built officially - https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/blob/master/library/orientdb For Dockerfile which contain "openjdk:8-jdk-slim" as the base image wont work for power as tag due to below reason "no matching manifest for linux/ppc64le in the manifest list entries" As "alpine" base image is already multi-arch image , those images get created successfully. Have created "ppc64le" folders for all versions as done for "x86_64".
|
@luigidellaquila - Any possibility of this PR review ... we can add power support to releases and help orientdb docker image officially supported on power. |
|
Hi @ghatwala The problem here is that alpine image is no longer supported by DockerHub (see docker-library/official-images#6018 and docker-library/openjdk#322) so I don't know if this PR makes much sense in general... Thanks Luigi |
|
Hey @luigidellaquila , thanks for the quick repsonse here ... I agree on the alpine not being supported officially for any orientdb version - https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/blob/master/library/orientdb . Is there any other way to add power support to the supported version of orientdb - Any pointers ??
Any thoughts/comments on above ? |
My intent is to have "ppc64le" built officially - https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/blob/master/library/orientdb
For Dockerfile which contain "openjdk:8-jdk-slim" as the base image wont work for power as tag due to below reason
"no matching manifest for linux/ppc64le in the manifest list entries"
As "alpine" base image is already multi-arch image , those images get created successfully.
Have created "ppc64le" folders for all versions as done for "x86_64".
Confirmation of the image builds completing successfully on ppc64le m/c for the versions sought to be added in this PR.
@luigidellaquila , @Laa - Any review comments here - please ?