Skip to content

Conversation

@mikaelarguedas
Copy link
Contributor

This is generated from osrf/docker_templates#116

Now that the noetic final snapshot is available we can move ros noetic images to target the snapshot repository: #814

This will fix currently broken ROS Noetic docker images

…pository

Signed-off-by: Mikael Arguedas <mikael.arguedas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikael Arguedas <mikael.arguedas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikael Arguedas <mikael.arguedas@gmail.com>
…fore retirement

Signed-off-by: Mikael Arguedas <mikael.arguedas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikael Arguedas <mikael.arguedas@gmail.com>
@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas requested review from ruffsl and tfoote June 7, 2025 08:10
ros-noetic-rospy-tutorials=0.10.2-1* \
ros-noetic-ros-comm=1.17.4-1* \
ros-noetic-roscpp-tutorials=0.10.3-1* \
ros-noetic-rospy-tutorials=0.10.3-1* \
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting that these aren't already set to the last package versions.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas Jun 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Foxy has been EOL for a while, so the Noetic packages versions for building the bridge were not bumped since. Hopefully this will be ok with upstream to rebuild the images

- 'ros/kilted/**'
- 'ros/humble/**'
# - 'ros/noetic/**'
- 'ros/noetic/**'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to add the EOL distros here as well for our CI to rebuild the OSRF tags?
We could also add them later also after the core tags have been merged upstream.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tricky part is that the dockerfiles dont match the currently generated files (templates have evolved since those became EOL) so CI would be failing for those ditros. So not clear to me how we want to rebuild these images. I suspect we'll just have to rebuild them by hand and push them #818

Copy link
Contributor

@tfoote tfoote left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally this looks good. Let's land the templates change first and then we don't need the branch change.

###### Requirements with Repo Specifiers ######
# See https://pip.readthedocs.io/en/stable/reference/pip_install/#git
git+https://github.com/osrf/docker_templates.git@master#egg=docker_templates
git+https://github.com/osrf/docker_templates.git@follow-up-templates-114#egg=docker_templates
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The templates change is approved. Let's revert this before merging

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

df5a0a8

Signed-off-by: Mikael Arguedas <mikael.arguedas@gmail.com>
@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas merged commit 0a34244 into master Jun 8, 2025
10 checks passed
@mikaelarguedas mikaelarguedas deleted the snapshots_noetic branch June 8, 2025 07:40
@mikaelarguedas
Copy link
Contributor Author

Upstream PR: docker-library/official-images#19221

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants