-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
Create Recursive Language Model skill epic #84
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Add comprehensive task epic for building RLM skill that applies MIT's Recursive Language Model strategies to AI agent codebase exploration. Epic includes 7 tasks covering research, design, implementation of fan-out search, SQLite indexing, and SudoLang skill specification.
Research findings include: - Agent Skills specification from agentskills.io - MIT RLM paper analysis (arXiv 2512.24601) - Implementation architecture for aidd framework - Complete SQLite database design with FTS5 Documents recursive language model strategies for deep codebase exploration through hierarchical task decomposition.
Replace single RLM epic with comprehensive phase-based approach: Phase 1: SQLite Foundation + Indexing + Fan-out Search - Database schema for documents, dependencies, productmanager - Frontmatter and dependency indexers with TDD - Fan-out search combining keyword, semantic, structured - CLI query and indexing tools Phase 2: Jiron DB API Skill - Generic skill for SudoLang → Jiron API generation - SQLite query bridge and middleware integration - Fan-out search exposed via Jiron endpoints - Includes ai/skills/jiron skill to teach agents Jiron protocol Phase 3: Frontmatter Index Jiron API - Apply Jiron DB API skill to frontmatter/codebase index - Self-documenting API with progressive discovery - Search and traversal endpoints with rich queries Phase 4: ProductManager Skill Conversion - Convert ai/rules/productmanager.mdc to full skill - Jiron API for story maps with SQLite as source of truth - Import existing YAML, export on demand - Database-backed workflows Phase 5: RLM Skill - Recursive exploration through hierarchical decomposition - Orchestrates all previous phases - User journey documented with pain points - Always-surfaced skill with agent self-direction Archived original RLM epic for reference.
Analyzed 2026-01-20-claude-code-skills branch to check for conflicts with our Phase 1-5 RLM + DB + Jiron epic plans. Key findings: - No blocking conflicts (.claude/ vs ai/ directories) - janhesters built YAML-based skills for Claude Code - Our approach adds SQLite + Jiron APIs + RLM on top - Different problem spaces that complement each other - Both can coexist and potentially converge later Recommendation: Proceed with all 5 phases as planned.
Created comprehensive overview document that provides: - Executive summary and big picture - Visual phase dependencies and implementation order - Concise summary of each phase with deliverables - Architecture decisions with rationale - Value proposition and quantified benefits - Success metrics for each phase - Implementation strategy and risk mitigation - Links to detailed phase epics and research docs - Relationship to janhesters' work Makes it easy to absorb the entire 5-phase epic structure at a glance before diving into detailed task lists.
Creates database-backed indexing system with FTS5 full-text search, dependency tracking, and ProductManager entities. Replaces YAML as source of truth for project metadata. Implements Phase 1 foundation for Recursive Language Model skill.
Auto-formatting from pre-commit hook.
|
@cursoragent please /review and diagnose failures |
🔬 Code Review: Recursive Language Model Skill Epic🎯 Review ContextReviewing PR #84 which adds comprehensive RLM skill groundwork including SQLite schema creation, planning documentation, and project configuration updates. The CI is failing with 🚨 CI Failure DiagnosisRoot CauseIssue: The test suite uses import { Database } from "bun:sqlite";
import { createSchema } from "./create-schema.js";Failure Flow:
Current Mitigation (Incomplete):
Solution OptionsOption 1: Make Code Runtime-Agnostic (Recommended) // Detect runtime and use appropriate SQLite library
const Database = globalThis.Bun
? (await import('bun:sqlite')).Database
: (await import('better-sqlite3')).default;Pros: Works everywhere, uses optimal library per runtime Option 2: Update CI to Run Bun Tests Separately - name: Run Node tests
run: npm run test:unit
- name: Install Bun
uses: oven-sh/setup-bun@v1
- name: Run Bun tests
run: npm run test:bunPros: Clean separation, tests real Bun environment Option 3: Exclude from Main Test Script "test": "vitest run --exclude '**/*-e2e.test.js' --exclude '**/create-schema.test.js' && npm run -s lint && npm run -s typecheck"Pros: Quick fix, mirrors Recommendation: Implement Option 1 for maximum compatibility, then add Option 2 to CI for comprehensive testing. 1. Code Structure and Organization🎯 What I'm ReviewingCode organization, file placement, and architectural decisions for the SQLite schema foundation. 💡 ObservationsStrengths:
Issues:
🪞 Critical ReflectionThe planning documentation is thorough and well-researched. However, the implementation shows signs of rushing - index files weren't updated, type definitions are missing, and runtime compatibility wasn't considered. 🔭 Broader ContextThis is foundational code for Phase 1 of a 5-phase epic. Any compatibility issues here will cascade to future phases. Getting the foundation right is critical. ⚖️ Score: 7/10Good structure, but missing polish and completeness checks. 2. Adherence to Coding Standards🎯 Checking Against
💡 ObservationsFollows Project Standards: ✅
JavaScript Best Practices: ✅ export function createSchema(db) {
Test Quality: ✅ test("should return version and success status", async () => {
const result = createSchema(db);
assert({
given: "schema creation",
should: "return version 1",
actual: result.version,
expected: 1,
});
Issues:
🪞 Critical ReflectionThe code follows FP principles well. Tests are thorough and isolated. However, some async/await usage is cosmetic, and the lack of JSDoc hurts discoverability. ⚖️ Score: 8/10Strong adherence to standards, minor improvements needed. 3. Test Coverage and Quality🎯 EvaluatingTest comprehensiveness, edge cases, and TDD compliance. 💡 AnalysisCoverage: Excellent ✅
Test Quality: Strong ✅ test("should enforce foreign key constraints", async () => {
createSchema(db);
let errorThrown = false;
let errorMessage = "";
try {
db.prepare(
`
INSERT INTO stories (
id, step_id, name, priority, status, created_at, updated_at
) VALUES (
'story1', 'nonexistent', 'Test Story', 50, 'backlog', ?, ?
)
`,
).run(Date.now(), Date.now());
} catch (error) {
errorThrown = true;
errorMessage = error.message;
}
assert({
given: "invalid foreign key",
should: "throw foreign key constraint error",
actual: errorThrown && errorMessage.includes("FOREIGN KEY"),
expected: true,
});Tests verify both happy paths and constraints. Good coverage of SQL semantics. Missing Tests:
🔭 ExpansionThe design doc mentions "TDD-friendly in-memory tests" and this delivers. However, missing integration tests for the CLI path and performance validation against stated goals (100 files in <1s). ⚖️ Score: 8.5/10Excellent unit test coverage, missing integration and performance tests. 4. Performance Considerations🎯 EvaluatingImplementation efficiency against stated performance goals. 💡 AnalysisDesign Goals (from
Implementation: Good Foundation ✅ // Enable foreign keys
db.exec("PRAGMA foreign_keys = ON");
// Schema version tracking
db.exec(`
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS schema_version (
version INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
applied_at INTEGER NOT NULL
)
`);Efficient Patterns:
Missing Optimizations:
Potential Issues: db.exec(`
CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_documents_type ON documents(type);
CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_documents_indexed_at ON documents(indexed_at);
CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_documents_modified_at ON documents(modified_at);Multiple indexes created separately. Could use single exec with multiple statements for better performance. 🪞 Critical ReflectionSchema is well-designed for performance, but implementation doesn't wrap everything in a transaction. For 100+ tables/indexes, this could be noticeable. ⚖️ Score: 7/10Good design, missing production-grade optimizations. 5. Security Scan🎯 Checking OWASP Top 10 + Project Security RulesOWASP Top 10 (2021) Analysis:
💡 Security Issues FoundA02: Cryptographic Failures hash TEXT NOT NULL,Design doc mentions SHA256 for change detection, but no validation that hashes use cryptographic functions. Should enforce in schema or docs. A05: Security Misconfiguration // Enable foreign keys
db.exec("PRAGMA foreign_keys = ON");Missing security-relevant PRAGMAs:
A08: Software/Data Integrity // Record schema version
const version = 1;
const now = Date.now();
const existing = db
.prepare("SELECT version FROM schema_version WHERE version = ?")
.get(version);
if (!existing) {
db.prepare(
"INSERT INTO schema_version (version, applied_at) VALUES (?, ?)",No integrity checks. If database is tampered with, no detection mechanism. Consider adding:
Input Validation: ✅ Good Tests show proper use of prepared statements, avoiding SQL injection. 🔭 Broader ContextThis is infrastructure code, so security is primarily about data integrity and safe defaults. No immediate vulnerabilities, but missing defense-in-depth layers. ⚖️ Score: 7.5/10No critical vulnerabilities, but missing security hardening. 6. Architectural Patterns & Design Decisions🎯 EvaluatingDesign decisions against project goals and best practices. 💡 AnalysisDecision 1: Bun-Specific Implementation import { Database } from "bun:sqlite";Reasoning (from design doc):
Critical Reflection: ❌
Verdict: Architectural mismatch. Should use Decision 2: SQLite Over Alternatives Rationale (from design doc):
Verdict: ✅ Excellent choice for use case. Decision 3: Hybrid Document + Structured Storage // Documents table - main frontmatter index
db.exec(`
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS documents (
path TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
type TEXT NOT NULL,
frontmatter JSON,
content TEXT,
hash TEXT NOT NULL,
indexed_at INTEGER NOT NULL,
file_size INTEGER,
modified_at INTEGER
)
`);Verdict: ✅ Smart. Flexible JSON for varying schemas, structured tables for complex queries. Decision 4: FTS5 with Triggers // Triggers to keep FTS5 in sync with documents table
db.exec(`
DROP TRIGGER IF EXISTS documents_fts_insert;
CREATE TRIGGER documents_fts_insert AFTER INSERT ON documents BEGINVerdict: ✅ Excellent. Automatic sync prevents stale search results. 🪞 Critical ReflectionStrong architectural decisions overall, but critical error: Implementation uses ⚖️ Score: 6/10Great design marred by implementation that contradicts design doc. 7. Documentation & Commit Quality🎯 CheckingDocumentation completeness, commit messages, inline comments. 💡 AnalysisPlanning Documentation: Excellent ✅
Code Documentation: Weak ❌ #!/usr/bin/env bun
/**
* SQLite Schema Creation
* Creates the complete database schema for aidd indexing system
*/
import { Database } from "bun:sqlite";
/**
* Creates the complete database schema
* @param {Database} db - SQLite database instance
*/Missing:
Commit Messages: Good ✅ Follows conventional commits, clear descriptions. Index Files: Broken ❌ # tools
This index provides an overview of the contents in this directory.
*This directory is empty.*Says "empty" but contains 2 files. Pre-commit hook should have caught this. 🔭 ExpansionPer
Issue: Pre-commit hook didn't update index, OR files are missing frontmatter. Let me check: #!/usr/bin/env bun
/**
* SQLite Schema Creation
* Creates the complete database schema for aidd indexing system
*/❌ No frontmatter. Should have: ---
description: Creates complete SQLite schema for aidd indexing
---⚖️ Score: 6/10Excellent planning docs, weak code docs, broken index generation. 8. Missing TypeScript Definitions🎯 CheckingType safety and developer experience. 💡 IssueProject has
But missing:
Should export: import type { Database } from 'better-sqlite3';
export interface SchemaResult {
version: number;
tablesCreated: boolean;
}
export function createSchema(db: Database): SchemaResult;⚖️ Score: 5/10Inconsistent with project patterns. 9. Comparison to Requirements🎯 CheckingImplementation against Phase 1 success criteria. From Epic ( Success Criteria:
Verdict: Partial implementation. Schema foundation is solid, but missing query tools and failing CI. 📋 Summary & Actionable RecommendationsCritical Issues (Must Fix)
High Priority (Should Fix)
Medium Priority (Good to Have)
⚖️ Overall Scores
Overall: 7.2/10 - Good foundation with critical CI issue 🎯 RecommendationDO NOT MERGE until CI passes. Fix the Bun/Node compatibility issue and update index files. The architectural foundation is solid, but implementation contradicts design doc and breaks CI. Once CI is green, this is a strong foundation for Phase 1. The planning documentation is excellent and shows thoughtful design. 💬 Specific Code Changes NeededFix 1: Runtime Compatibility// ai/tools/create-schema.js
let Database;
if (globalThis.Bun) {
Database = (await import('bun:sqlite')).Database;
} else {
Database = (await import('better-sqlite3')).default;
}
export function createSchema(db) {
// ... rest of implementation
}Fix 2: Add Frontmatter---
description: Creates complete SQLite schema for aidd indexing system with FTS5, ProductManager tables, and dependency tracking
---
#!/usr/bin/env bun
/**
* SQLite Schema CreationFix 3: Update Index (will auto-generate after adding frontmatter)Run: Fix 4: Add TypeScript DefinitionsCreate import type { Database } from 'better-sqlite3';
export interface SchemaResult {
version: number;
tablesCreated: boolean;
}
export function createSchema(db: Database): SchemaResult;This review follows the systematic process from |
Add comprehensive task epic for building RLM skill that applies MIT's
Recursive Language Model strategies to AI agent codebase exploration.
Epic includes 7 tasks covering research, design, implementation of
fan-out search, SQLite indexing, and SudoLang skill specification.
Note
Lays groundwork for the RLM skill with a SQLite indexing schema and planning docs, plus project setup updates.
ai/tools/create-schema.js(with CLI) and comprehensive tests to create SQLite schema:documents+ FTS5,dependencies, and ProductManager tables (personas,journeys,steps,pain_points,stories,functional_requirements), with indexes and triggersplan/rlm/(spec, architecture, database design, research summary)package.json(addsbetter-sqlite3, newtest:bun, adjusts unit test filters) and adds.gitattributesai/index.md,ai/rules/index.md) and addsai/rules/sudolang/index.mdandai/tools/index.mdWritten by Cursor Bugbot for commit 5bb8333. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.