Conversation
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request refactors the frontend UI component architecture, replacing legacy components (Agenda, ModalController, LeftPanel, ConnectionBox) with reorganized alternatives (Modal, AgendaFrame, ConnBox). Updates component APIs, moves PresenceChangeable interface, reorganizes modal views, and adjusts callback patterns throughout the component hierarchy and Layout. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~60 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
petrubraha
requested review from
DannyDaniel-03,
MeraruIoanLucian,
NescafeAlgeria and
blindeyethe
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
src/frontend/modal_views/url_view.py (1)
54-67: Addprocess_redis_urlto the core module's exports.The function
process_redis_urlis defined insrc/util.pybut is not re-exported fromsrc/core/__init__.py. The code callscore.process_redis_url(url)at line 63, which will fail with anAttributeErrorat runtime. Either import and add it to the__all__list incore/__init__.py, or import directly fromutilinurl_view.py.
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@src/frontend/components/chat.py`:
- Around line 86-90: The CLEAR_CMD branch clears self.history_box.controls but
fails to refresh the UI; after calling self.history_box.controls.clear() in the
Chat.CLEAR_CMD handling path, call self.history_box.update() (same pattern used
in add_res) so the UI reflects the cleared history immediately; ensure you
update in the block where Chat.CLEAR_CMD is checked and keep the existing
logger.debug call.
- Around line 96-101: The request bubble is appended to history_box.controls but
never triggers a UI refresh; in the method that adds/prints requests (the code
using self._add_msg_bubble and appending to self.history_box.controls) call
self.history_box.update() immediately after appending the bubble (mirroring
add_res behavior) so the request appears without waiting for the response;
update the method that contains self._on_enter(req) / self._add_msg_bubble(...)
to include this call.
In `@src/frontend/layout.py`:
- Around line 19-25: The Layout constructor now requires an add_conn_callback
(Callable[[tuple], None]); update the call site where Layout() is instantiated
to pass the appropriate callback that accepts a connection tuple (e.g., an
existing add_conn_callback or a thin wrapper function). Locate the Layout class
__init__ in layout.py (which constructs Modal(add_conn_callback=...),
AgendaFrame(show_modal_callback=modal.show), ChatFrame()) and replace the no-arg
Layout() instantiation with Layout(add_conn_callback=your_callback) so the Modal
receives the callback; ensure the passed function matches the signature
Callable[[tuple], None].
In `@src/frontend/modal.py`:
- Around line 7-12: The Modal class docstring contains a typo: change "Though
text field(s) takes connection creation details..." to "Through text field(s)
take connection creation details..." (or "Through text field(s) the modal takes
connection creation details...") to correct grammar; update the docstring in the
Modal class definition (class Modal(ft.Container, PresenceChangeable))
accordingly so the description reads clearly.
- Around line 40-48: The docstring for on_continue is inconsistent with its type
hint: update the parameter description for conn_data in the on_continue method
to match the annotated type (tuple) instead of "arr", and optionally clarify the
tuple contents (e.g., connection parameters) so the docstring and the type hint
align; modify the docstring under the on_continue function accordingly.
In `@tst/frontend/components/test_chat.py`:
- Around line 62-69: The test fails because the EXIT command path returns
immediately after calling _exit_cmd_callback() and never awaits
cmd_input.focus(); update the implementation so that add_req (or
_exit_cmd_callback) calls and awaits self.cmd_input.focus() before returning
(mirroring the CLEAR path) so test_on_submit_exit's assertions on focus succeed;
ensure you modify the EXIT branch in add_req (or inside _exit_cmd_callback) to
await self.cmd_input.focus() after invoking _exit_cmd_callback() and before
returning.
🧹 Nitpick comments (11)
tst/frontend/modal_views/test_url_view.py (1)
6-6: Rename test class toTestUrlViewfor consistency.The class under test was renamed from
UrlConnecttoUrlView, but the test class name remainsTestUrlConnect. Update it to maintain naming consistency.Suggested fix
-class TestUrlConnect(TestCase): +class TestUrlView(TestCase):Also update the patcher references on lines 11 and 18:
- self.mock_process = TestUrlConnect.process_patcher.start() + self.mock_process = TestUrlView.process_patcher.start()- TestUrlConnect.process_patcher.stop() + TestUrlView.process_patcher.stop()tst/frontend/components/test_conn_box.py (1)
20-23: Index-based control access is fragile.Accessing
self.box.content.controls[1]assumes theIconButtonis always at index 1 in theStack. If the control order changes, this test will break silently or fail unexpectedly. Consider adding a comment documenting this assumption.Suggested improvement
def test_on_close(self): + # IconButton is the second control in the Stack (index 1) icon_btn = self.box.content.controls[1] icon_btn.on_click() self.on_close.assert_called()tst/frontend/test_agenda_frame.py (1)
35-42: Consider resetting mock between operations for precise verification.
test_rem_boxcallsadd_boxfirst, which triggersupdate(). The finalassert_called()passes but doesn't specifically verify thatrem_boxtriggered the update. Consider usingreset_mock()or checking call count for clearer intent.Suggested improvement
def test_rem_box(self): mock_box = MagicMock() self.agenda_frame.add_box(mock_box) + self.agenda_frame.update.reset_mock() self.agenda_frame.rem_box(mock_box) self.assertNotIn(mock_box, self.agenda_frame.conn_boxes.controls) self.agenda_frame.update.assert_called()src/frontend/components/chat.py (3)
72-72: Prefix unusedeventparameter with underscore.The static analysis tool correctly flags
eventas unused. Prefix it with an underscore to indicate it's intentionally ignored.Suggested fix
- async def add_req(self, event) -> None: + async def add_req(self, _event) -> None:
92-94: EXIT command returns before focusing input.When CLEAR is handled,
focus()is called before returning. For EXIT, the method returns immediately without awaiting focus. While this may be intentional (the UI might close anyway), consider whether consistency is desired here.
22-22: Consider adding type hint forexit_cmd_callback.The
on_enterparameter has a type hintCallable[[str], None], butexit_cmd_callbackis only typed asCallable. For consistency and clarity, consider specifying the full signature.Suggested fix
- def __init__(self, text: str, on_enter: Callable[[str], None], exit_cmd_callback: Callable) -> None: + def __init__(self, text: str, on_enter: Callable[[str], None], exit_cmd_callback: Callable[[], None]) -> None:src/frontend/chat_frame.py (1)
48-53: Update docstring to reflect new signature.The docstring still says "Removes the specified chat" but
rem_chatno longer takes achatparameter. Consider updating the description to match the new behavior.Suggested fix
def rem_chat(self) -> None: """ - Removes the specified chat and reverts to the default layer. + Removes the current chat and reverts to the default layer. """ self.content = self.default_layer self.update()src/frontend/__init__.py (1)
8-11: Sort__all__to satisfy Ruff (RUF022).♻️ Proposed fix
-__all__ = ["ModalBase", "PresenceChangeable", - "Chat", "ConnBox", - "AgendaFrame", "ChatFrame", "Layout", - "Modal"] +__all__ = ["AgendaFrame", "Chat", "ChatFrame", "ConnBox", + "Layout", "Modal", "ModalBase", "PresenceChangeable"]tst/frontend/modal_views/test_manual_view.py (1)
4-12: Rename the test class to matchManualView.♻️ Proposed fix
-class TestManualConnect(TestCase): +class TestManualView(TestCase):tst/frontend/test_layout.py (1)
25-28: Consider verifying theshow_modal_callbackargument passed toAgendaFrame.Per the
Layoutimplementation insrc/frontend/layout.py(lines 22-23),AgendaFrameis initialized withshow_modal_callback=modal.show. The current assertion only verifies thatAgendaFramewas called, but not with the correct callback.♻️ Proposed enhancement
def test_init(self): self.mock_chatframe_cls.assert_called() self.mock_modal_cls.assert_called_with(add_conn_callback=self.add_conn_callback) - self.mock_agendaframe_cls.assert_called() + self.mock_agendaframe_cls.assert_called_with( + show_modal_callback=self.mock_modal_cls.return_value.show + )src/frontend/modal.py (1)
14-38: Potential issue: referencingself.hidebefore superclass initialization.On line 15,
self.hideis passed to the close button'son_clickhandler beforeft.Container.__init__is called on line 27. While Python allows method references on partially constructed objects, this pattern can be fragile. In this case it works becausehideis inherited fromPresenceChangeableand doesn't depend onContainerstate at binding time, but consider initializing the container first for clarity.♻️ Proposed reorder
def __init__(self, add_conn_callback: Callable[[tuple], None]) -> None: + ft.Container.__init__( + self, + expand=True, + bgcolor=ft.Colors.BLACK_54, + alignment=ft.Alignment.CENTER, + visible=False + ) + close_btn = ft.IconButton(ft.Icons.CLOSE, on_click=self.hide, tooltip="Close") url_view = UrlView( on_continue=self.on_continue, switch_btn=ft.Button("Switch to manual mode", on_click=self.switch_view), close_btn=close_btn ) manual_view = ManualView( on_continue=self.on_continue, switch_btn=ft.Button("Switch to URL mode", on_click=self.switch_view), close_btn=close_btn ) - ft.Container.__init__( - self, - content=url_view, - expand=True, - bgcolor=ft.Colors.BLACK_54, - alignment=ft.Alignment.CENTER, - visible=False - ) + self.content = url_view self.is_manual = False self.url_view = url_view self.manual_view = manual_view self._add_conn_callback = add_conn_callback
| # Handle special cases. | ||
| if req.upper() == Chat.CLEAR_CMD: | ||
| self.history_box.controls.clear() | ||
| logger.debug("Cleaned chat history.") | ||
| return |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing update() call after clearing history.
After clearing history_box.controls, the UI won't refresh until the next interaction. The add_res method correctly calls self.history_box.update() after modifying controls, but this path does not.
Suggested fix
if req.upper() == Chat.CLEAR_CMD:
self.history_box.controls.clear()
+ self.history_box.update()
logger.debug("Cleaned chat history.")
return📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| # Handle special cases. | |
| if req.upper() == Chat.CLEAR_CMD: | |
| self.history_box.controls.clear() | |
| logger.debug("Cleaned chat history.") | |
| return | |
| # Handle special cases. | |
| if req.upper() == Chat.CLEAR_CMD: | |
| self.history_box.controls.clear() | |
| self.history_box.update() | |
| logger.debug("Cleaned chat history.") | |
| return |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@src/frontend/components/chat.py` around lines 86 - 90, The CLEAR_CMD branch
clears self.history_box.controls but fails to refresh the UI; after calling
self.history_box.controls.clear() in the Chat.CLEAR_CMD handling path, call
self.history_box.update() (same pattern used in add_res) so the UI reflects the
cleared history immediately; ensure you update in the block where Chat.CLEAR_CMD
is checked and keep the existing logger.debug call.
| # Was not a special case, forwards the request to the network layer. | ||
| logger.debug(f"Frontend printing of the request: {req}.") | ||
| self._on_enter(req) | ||
| await self.cmd_input.focus() | ||
| self.cmd_input.value = "" | ||
|
|
||
| bubble = self._add_msg_bubble(req, ft.MainAxisAlignment.END, ft.Colors.BLUE_600) | ||
| self.history_box.controls.append(bubble) | ||
| logger.debug("Request printed.") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing update() after appending request bubble.
Similar to the CLEAR case, after appending a bubble to history_box.controls, there's no update() call. The add_res method calls self.history_box.update() after appending, but add_req does not. This inconsistency may cause the request bubble to not appear until the response arrives.
Suggested fix
self._on_enter(req)
bubble = self._add_msg_bubble(req, ft.MainAxisAlignment.END, ft.Colors.BLUE_600)
self.history_box.controls.append(bubble)
+ self.history_box.update()
logger.debug("Request printed.")📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| # Was not a special case, forwards the request to the network layer. | |
| logger.debug(f"Frontend printing of the request: {req}.") | |
| self._on_enter(req) | |
| await self.cmd_input.focus() | |
| self.cmd_input.value = "" | |
| bubble = self._add_msg_bubble(req, ft.MainAxisAlignment.END, ft.Colors.BLUE_600) | |
| self.history_box.controls.append(bubble) | |
| logger.debug("Request printed.") | |
| # Was not a special case, forwards the request to the network layer. | |
| logger.debug(f"Frontend printing of the request: {req}.") | |
| self._on_enter(req) | |
| bubble = self._add_msg_bubble(req, ft.MainAxisAlignment.END, ft.Colors.BLUE_600) | |
| self.history_box.controls.append(bubble) | |
| self.history_box.update() | |
| logger.debug("Request printed.") |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@src/frontend/components/chat.py` around lines 96 - 101, The request bubble is
appended to history_box.controls but never triggers a UI refresh; in the method
that adds/prints requests (the code using self._add_msg_bubble and appending to
self.history_box.controls) call self.history_box.update() immediately after
appending the bubble (mirroring add_res behavior) so the request appears without
waiting for the response; update the method that contains self._on_enter(req) /
self._add_msg_bubble(...) to include this call.
| def __init__(self, add_conn_callback: Callable[[tuple], None]) -> None: | ||
| """ | ||
| Initializes the layout controls, including Agenda, ChatFrame, and ModalController. | ||
| Initializes the layout controls, including Agenda, ChatFrame, and Modal. | ||
| """ | ||
|
|
||
| agenda = Agenda() | ||
| modal = Modal(add_conn_callback=add_conn_callback) | ||
| agenda_frame = AgendaFrame(show_modal_callback=modal.show) | ||
| chat_frame = ChatFrame() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Find Layout instantiations and confirm add_conn_callback is supplied.
rg -nP --type=py -C2 '\bLayout\s*\('Repository: petru-braha/RC-application
Length of output: 931
Fix Layout() instantiation in src/main.py:47 to pass the required add_conn_callback parameter. This call currently has no arguments but the constructor now requires add_conn_callback: Callable[[tuple], None].
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@src/frontend/layout.py` around lines 19 - 25, The Layout constructor now
requires an add_conn_callback (Callable[[tuple], None]); update the call site
where Layout() is instantiated to pass the appropriate callback that accepts a
connection tuple (e.g., an existing add_conn_callback or a thin wrapper
function). Locate the Layout class __init__ in layout.py (which constructs
Modal(add_conn_callback=...), AgendaFrame(show_modal_callback=modal.show),
ChatFrame()) and replace the no-arg Layout() instantiation with
Layout(add_conn_callback=your_callback) so the Modal receives the callback;
ensure the passed function matches the signature Callable[[tuple], None].
| class Modal(ft.Container, PresenceChangeable): | ||
| """ | ||
| Though text field(s) takes connection creation details and forwards them to the reactor. | ||
| - url view - only one text field for the url | ||
| - manual view - the user has to insert the host, port, and other data | ||
| """ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Minor typo in docstring.
The docstring has a typo: "Though text field(s)" should likely be "Through text field(s)".
📝 Proposed fix
class Modal(ft.Container, PresenceChangeable):
"""
- Though text field(s) takes connection creation details and forwards them to the reactor.
+ Through text field(s) takes connection creation details and forwards them to the reactor.
- url view - only one text field for the url
- manual view - the user has to insert the host, port, and other data
"""📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| class Modal(ft.Container, PresenceChangeable): | |
| """ | |
| Though text field(s) takes connection creation details and forwards them to the reactor. | |
| - url view - only one text field for the url | |
| - manual view - the user has to insert the host, port, and other data | |
| """ | |
| class Modal(ft.Container, PresenceChangeable): | |
| """ | |
| Through text field(s) takes connection creation details and forwards them to the reactor. | |
| - url view - only one text field for the url | |
| - manual view - the user has to insert the host, port, and other data | |
| """ |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@src/frontend/modal.py` around lines 7 - 12, The Modal class docstring
contains a typo: change "Though text field(s) takes connection creation
details..." to "Through text field(s) take connection creation details..." (or
"Through text field(s) the modal takes connection creation details...") to
correct grammar; update the docstring in the Modal class definition (class
Modal(ft.Container, PresenceChangeable)) accordingly so the description reads
clearly.
| def on_continue(self, conn_data: tuple) -> None: | ||
| """ | ||
| Forwards the connection data and closes the modal. | ||
|
|
||
| Args: | ||
| conn_data (arr): Data to instantiate the connection object. | ||
| """ | ||
| self._add_conn_callback(conn_data) | ||
| self.hide() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Docstring inconsistency: "arr" vs "tuple".
The docstring says conn_data (arr) but the type hint indicates tuple. Update for consistency.
📝 Proposed fix
def on_continue(self, conn_data: tuple) -> None:
"""
Forwards the connection data and closes the modal.
Args:
- conn_data (arr): Data to instantiate the connection object.
+ conn_data (tuple): Data to instantiate the connection object.
"""📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| def on_continue(self, conn_data: tuple) -> None: | |
| """ | |
| Forwards the connection data and closes the modal. | |
| Args: | |
| conn_data (arr): Data to instantiate the connection object. | |
| """ | |
| self._add_conn_callback(conn_data) | |
| self.hide() | |
| def on_continue(self, conn_data: tuple) -> None: | |
| """ | |
| Forwards the connection data and closes the modal. | |
| Args: | |
| conn_data (tuple): Data to instantiate the connection object. | |
| """ | |
| self._add_conn_callback(conn_data) | |
| self.hide() |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@src/frontend/modal.py` around lines 40 - 48, The docstring for on_continue is
inconsistent with its type hint: update the parameter description for conn_data
in the on_continue method to match the annotated type (tuple) instead of "arr",
and optionally clarify the tuple contents (e.g., connection parameters) so the
docstring and the type hint align; modify the docstring under the on_continue
function accordingly.
| def test_on_submit_exit(self): | ||
| self.chat.cmd_input.value = "EXIT" | ||
|
|
||
| asyncio.run(self.chat.add_req(None)) | ||
|
|
||
| self.on_exit.assert_called() | ||
| self.on_enter.assert_not_called() | ||
| self.chat.cmd_input.focus.assert_called() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Test assertion may fail: EXIT command doesn't call focus().
Looking at src/frontend/components/chat.py lines 92-94, the EXIT command returns immediately after calling _exit_cmd_callback() without awaiting focus(). This test expects focus to be called, which will fail.
Either update the test to match the actual behavior, or update the implementation to call focus() before returning (for consistency with the CLEAR path).
Option 1: Update test to match implementation
def test_on_submit_exit(self):
self.chat.cmd_input.value = "EXIT"
asyncio.run(self.chat.add_req(None))
self.on_exit.assert_called()
self.on_enter.assert_not_called()
- self.chat.cmd_input.focus.assert_called()
+ self.chat.cmd_input.focus.assert_not_called()Option 2: Update implementation to call focus (in chat.py)
if req.upper() == Chat.EXIT_CMD:
+ await self.cmd_input.focus()
self._exit_cmd_callback()
return📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| def test_on_submit_exit(self): | |
| self.chat.cmd_input.value = "EXIT" | |
| asyncio.run(self.chat.add_req(None)) | |
| self.on_exit.assert_called() | |
| self.on_enter.assert_not_called() | |
| self.chat.cmd_input.focus.assert_called() | |
| def test_on_submit_exit(self): | |
| self.chat.cmd_input.value = "EXIT" | |
| asyncio.run(self.chat.add_req(None)) | |
| self.on_exit.assert_called() | |
| self.on_enter.assert_not_called() | |
| self.chat.cmd_input.focus.assert_not_called() |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@tst/frontend/components/test_chat.py` around lines 62 - 69, The test fails
because the EXIT command path returns immediately after calling
_exit_cmd_callback() and never awaits cmd_input.focus(); update the
implementation so that add_req (or _exit_cmd_callback) calls and awaits
self.cmd_input.focus() before returning (mirroring the CLEAR path) so
test_on_submit_exit's assertions on focus succeed; ensure you modify the EXIT
branch in add_req (or inside _exit_cmd_callback) to await self.cmd_input.focus()
after invoking _exit_cmd_callback() and before returning.
f3132ae to
856b3e2
Compare
… is responsible for taking care of the UI components
petrubraha
force-pushed
the
60-exit-command
branch
from
856b3e2 to
077358b
Compare
petrubraha
left a comment
petrubraha
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this can't be merged.
Ran 146 tests in 0.278s
FAILED (errors=3)
1 participant
decoupled the frontend from connection and transmission management.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
CLEAR(clears message history) andEXIT(closes the chat session).Improvements
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.