doc-frontend

[petrubraha]

doc: class diagram of the frontend components

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added a frontend architecture diagram that documents the UI structure and relationships: presence interface for show/hide, modal dialogs with URL and manual-entry views, agenda with connection boxes and controls, chat panels and frames, and the overall layout tying these components together—improves clarity of component organization and navigation for reviewers and maintainers.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a new PlantUML frontend diagram file declaring two interfaces (PresenceChangeable, ModalBase), eight classes (ConnBox, AgendaFrame, Chat, ChatFrame, Layout, ManualView, UrlView, Modal), their public fields/methods, and inheritance/aggregation relationships; no runtime behavior changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Frontend Architecture Diagram doc/frontend/RC-application.frontend.puml	New PlantUML diagram defining interfaces (PresenceChangeable, ModalBase), classes (ConnBox, AgendaFrame, Chat, ChatFrame, Layout, ManualView, UrlView, Modal), public fields/methods, inheritance links, and aggregation relations.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 I sketched the GUI with a nimble hop,
Boxes, chats, and modals in a crop,
Agenda rows and views that switch,
Little classes stacked in a stitch,
A rabbit's diagram — quick as a hop.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'doc-frontend' is vague and generic, using a hyphenated format that doesn't clearly convey the specific change—adding a PlantUML class diagram for frontend components.	Consider a more descriptive title like 'Add frontend class diagram' or 'docs: Add PlantUML class diagram for frontend components' to better communicate the specific change.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents

In `@doc/frontend/RC-application.frontend.puml`:
- Around line 36-40: The Layout class is missing a field for the aggregated
Modal(s); update the Layout class declaration (the block defining Layout with
agenda_frame, chat_frame, conn_boxes_dict) to add a public field for the modal
relationship (e.g., +modals: list<Modal> or +modal: Modal[*]) so it matches the
aggregation "Layout o-up- '*' Modal" and use the same visibility/style as other
fields (the + prefix) to keep the UML consistent.
- Around line 73-78: The PlantUML aggregation multiplicities are incorrect:
update the relationships to reflect the singular class fields (change "Layout
o-up- "*" AgendaFrame" and "Layout o-up- "*" ChatFrame" to use multiplicity "1"
or no-star), correct or remove the "Layout o-up- "*" Modal" link since Layout
has no Modal field (either add a singular modal field to Layout or remove the
relationship), and change "Modal o-up- "*" ManualView" and "Modal o-up- "*"
UrlView" to single multiplicity to match the fields +manual_view and +url_view;
alternatively, if you intend many-to-one, update the corresponding class fields
(agenda_frame, chat_frame, manual_view, url_view) to collection types instead of
singulars.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

doc/frontend/RC-application.frontend.puml (1)

13-14: Consider adding fields/methods to ConnBox or documenting its purpose.

ConnBox is defined as an empty class. If it's a placeholder, consider adding a comment or at least documenting expected fields (e.g., connection details, status indicator) to clarify its role in the architecture.

[petrubraha]

let's have two different documents: one is the puml class diagram itself (should represent precisely the classes used) and another one (describing each component of each class)