humain poc changes #63
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![windsurf-bot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1066231?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Other comments (3)
-
web/themes/dark/logo.svg (1-1)
The new SVG is missing the XML declaration and some namespace declarations that were in the original file. While the SVG may work without them in many contexts, consider adding them back for better compatibility:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <svg viewBox="0 0 101 14" fill="currentColor" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> - web/themes/light/logo.svg (1-1) The SVG is missing the XML declaration (``) and some namespace declarations that were in the original file. While many browsers will render this correctly, including these declarations ensures better compatibility across different environments and XML parsers.
- web/themes/light/styles.css (27-28) The `.theme-navbar__logo` class has a duplicate `height` property (lines 27-28). The second value (29px) will override the first one (100%). Consider removing the redundant property.
💡 To request another review, post a new comment with "/windsurf-review".
Comment on lines
154
to
158
| .password-field-wrapper { | ||
| position: relative; | ||
| display: inline-block; | ||
| width: 100%; | ||
| position: relative; | ||
| display: inline-block; | ||
| width: 100%; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The .password-field-wrapper class is defined twice in the file (lines 107-111 and lines 154-158) with identical properties. This duplication is unnecessary and should be removed to improve maintainability.
Comment on lines
164
to
179
| .toggle-password-button { | ||
| position: absolute; | ||
| right: 10px; | ||
| top: 50%; | ||
| transform: translateY(-50%); | ||
| background: transparent; | ||
| border: 0; | ||
| cursor: pointer; | ||
| color: inherit; | ||
| padding: 0; | ||
| height: 24px; | ||
| width: 24px; | ||
| display: flex; | ||
| align-items: center; | ||
| justify-content: center; | ||
| position: absolute; | ||
| right: 10px; | ||
| top: 50%; | ||
| transform: translateY(-50%); | ||
| background: transparent; | ||
| border: 0; | ||
| cursor: pointer; | ||
| color: inherit; | ||
| padding: 0; | ||
| height: 24px; | ||
| width: 24px; | ||
| display: flex; | ||
| align-items: center; | ||
| justify-content: center; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The .toggle-password-button class is defined twice (lines 113-122 and lines 164-179) with overlapping properties. This split definition can lead to confusion and unexpected styling behavior. Consider consolidating these into a single definition.
Comment on lines
152
to
163
| .dex-error-box { | ||
| background-color: #DD1327; | ||
| color: #fff; | ||
| font-size: 14px; | ||
| font-weight: normal; | ||
| max-width: 320px; | ||
| padding: 4px 0; | ||
| background-color: #dd1327; | ||
| color: #fff; | ||
| font-size: 14px; | ||
| font-weight: normal; | ||
| max-width: 320px; | ||
| padding: 4px 0; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .dex-error-box { | ||
| margin: 20px auto; | ||
| margin: 20px auto; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are duplicate CSS rules for .dex-error-box (lines 152-159 and 161-163). Consider merging these into a single rule for better maintainability:
Suggested change
| .dex-error-box { | |
| background-color: #DD1327; | |
| color: #fff; | |
| font-size: 14px; | |
| font-weight: normal; | |
| max-width: 320px; | |
| padding: 4px 0; | |
| background-color: #dd1327; | |
| color: #fff; | |
| font-size: 14px; | |
| font-weight: normal; | |
| max-width: 320px; | |
| padding: 4px 0; | |
| } | |
| .dex-error-box { | |
| margin: 20px auto; | |
| margin: 20px auto; | |
| } | |
| .dex-error-box { | |
| background-color: #dd1327; | |
| color: #fff; | |
| font-size: 14px; | |
| font-weight: normal; | |
| max-width: 320px; | |
| padding: 4px 0; | |
| margin: 20px auto; | |
| } |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
What this PR does / why we need it
Special notes for your reviewer
Summary by Bito