Skip to content

Conversation

@yogurtandjam
Copy link
Contributor

What's new in this PR?

In bullet point format, please describe what's new in this PR.

Why?

What problem does this solve?
Why is this important?
What's the context?

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 29, 2025 18:22
@octane-security-app
Copy link

Summary by Octane

New Contracts

No new contracts were added in this PR.

Updated Contracts

  • Raffle.sol: Clarified "winnerIndex" as the index in "prizeWinners" array, not the ticket index, in relevant functions.

🔗 Commit Hash: 65d88a2

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds clarifying comments to distinguish between winner index and winning ticket index parameters in three Raffle contract functions. The comments help prevent confusion about what the winnerIndex parameter represents.

  • Adds inline documentation to clarify the meaning of the winnerIndex parameter
  • Ensures consistent documentation across multiple functions that use this parameter
  • Improves code readability and reduces potential for misunderstanding

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@octane-security-app
Copy link

Overview

Vulnerabilities found: 2                                                                                
Severity breakdown: 1 High, 1 Low
Warnings found: 8                                                                                

Detailed findings

plume/src/spin/Raffle.sol

  • Unbounded iteration in Raffle.handleWinnerSelection (getValidWinnersCount) on growing prizeWinners causes VRF callback DoS and stalled winner selection. See more
  • Unbounded linear scan in Raffle.removePrize causes admin DoS on prize removal. See more

Warnings

plume/src/spin/Raffle.sol

  • Unbounded iteration over prizeWinners in Raffle winner-selection flow causes DoS of drawing winners. See more
  • Deprecated setWinner with misleading docs in Raffle causes integration DoS for prize finalization. See more
  • No freeze/snapshot during pending VRF in Raffle.sol causes ordering-dependent winner selection and last-minute dilution. See more
  • Reactivate-without-relisting in Raffle prize lifecycle causes hidden-but-active prizes omitted from enumeration. See more
  • Payable receive without withdrawal in Raffle implementation under misdeployment causes locked ETH. See more
  • Unprotected initializer in Raffle implementation causes attacker-controlled initialization and misleading on-chain events. See more
  • Missing deletion of pendingVRFRequests and pending-flag check in Raffle VRF cancellation handling causes canceled requests to still finalize winner selection. See more
  • Uncoordinated quantity/isActive update in Raffle.editPrize on active prize causes winner selection blockage and user ticket waste. See more

🔗 Commit Hash: 65d88a2
🛡️ Octane Dashboard: All vulnerabilities

@yogurtandjam yogurtandjam merged commit e68b8ce into main Oct 30, 2025
2 checks passed
@yogurtandjam yogurtandjam deleted the jerms/comment-for-clarity-on-winner-indexes branch October 30, 2025 01:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants