enable adding raffle tickets #243
Conversation
Summary by OctaneNew ContractsNo new contracts were added. Updated Contracts
🔗 Commit Hash: 572af5f |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This pull request adds administrative functionality to enable adding raffle tickets to user balances, along with comprehensive code formatting improvements throughout the Spin.sol contract.
- Adds
addRaffleTickets()function for admins to manually grant raffle tickets to users - Introduces
RaffleTicketsAddedevent for tracking administrative ticket additions - Applies consistent formatting to function signatures, conditionals, and multi-line statements
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| plume/src/spin/Spin.sol | Adds new addRaffleTickets function with ADMIN_ROLE access control, adds RaffleTicketsAdded event, and reformats code for consistency (function signatures, conditionals, event parameters) |
| plume/SPIN.md | Documents the new addRaffleTickets function in the technical reference table and adds the RaffleTicketsAdded event to the events list |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
plume/src/spin/Spin.sol
Outdated
| function addRaffleTickets( | ||
| address user, | ||
| uint256 amount | ||
| ) external onlyRole(ADMIN_ROLE) { | ||
| UserData storage userDataStorage = userData[user]; | ||
| userDataStorage.raffleTicketsBalance += amount; | ||
| emit RaffleTicketsAdded( | ||
| user, | ||
| amount, | ||
| userDataStorage.raffleTicketsBalance | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The function should validate that the user address is not the zero address to prevent accidental misconfigurations. Similar admin functions in the contract, such as adminWithdraw (line 447), include this validation pattern.
plume/src/spin/Spin.sol
Outdated
| function addRaffleTickets( | ||
| address user, | ||
| uint256 amount | ||
| ) external onlyRole(ADMIN_ROLE) { | ||
| UserData storage userDataStorage = userData[user]; | ||
| userDataStorage.raffleTicketsBalance += amount; | ||
| emit RaffleTicketsAdded( | ||
| user, | ||
| amount, | ||
| userDataStorage.raffleTicketsBalance | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The function should validate that amount is greater than zero to prevent empty operations that would still emit an event. This would make the contract state changes more meaningful and prevent misleading events.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@copilot we should still deisplay 0 values because that woudl be a bug, and it's easier to debug issues if we emit events for them
plume/src/spin/Spin.sol
Outdated
| function addRaffleTickets( | ||
| address user, | ||
| uint256 amount | ||
| ) external onlyRole(ADMIN_ROLE) { | ||
| UserData storage userDataStorage = userData[user]; | ||
| userDataStorage.raffleTicketsBalance += amount; | ||
| emit RaffleTicketsAdded( | ||
| user, | ||
| amount, | ||
| userDataStorage.raffleTicketsBalance | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The new addRaffleTickets function lacks test coverage. The test file includes coverage for the similar spendRaffleTickets function (see testspendRaffleTicketsAccessAndEffect in Spin.t.sol), and this new function should have similar test coverage to verify access control, balance updates, and event emissions.
Overview
Detailed findings
|
|
@yogurtandjam I've opened a new pull request, #244, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
What's new in this PR?
In bullet point format, please describe what's new in this PR.
Why?
What problem does this solve?
Why is this important?
What's the context?