Open
Conversation
After this patch, the following files are no longer indexed: "/", because layout == home "/index.md.bck", not interpreted as markdown so no title "/docs/loadflow/loadflow.html", layout == todo "/assets/css/custom.css", no title "/assets/css/main.css", no title "/assets/css/style.css", no title Signed-off-by: Jon Harper <jon.harper87@gmail.com>
Stripping new lines would fuse words across two consecutive lines, putting garbage in the index lunr handles newlines just fine Signed-off-by: Jon Harper <jon.harper87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Harper <jon.harper87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Harper <jon.harper87@gmail.com>
738b60c to
e139e42
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
feature
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
No autocomplete
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Autocomplete
Other information:
This is a POC autocomplete. If we decided to keep it, we should continue the work:
demo: