feat: Add an interface for the ability to process speech-to-text asynchronously #810
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…chronously This adds the ability to be able to send a request to a provider to create a transcript where the provider will give you an id and then send a webhook to you in the future when the job is done with that id. This is just supplying the interface that a provider can utilize in the future.
dcaswel
force-pushed
the
feature/async-speech-to-text
branch
from
0e09884 to
ded1505
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This adds the ability to be able to send a request to a provider to create a transcript where the provider will give you an id and then send a webhook to you in the future when the job is done with that id. This is just supplying the interface that a provider can utilize in the future.
We are hoping to utilize this functionality with a custom provider in the near future but I thought if there were other providers that have similar functionality, this could be useful.