Replace inefficient list comprehensions with for loops

[ptone]

Replace inefficient list comprehensions with for loops

Summary

This PR improves memory efficiency in the BirdFish lighting control framework by replacing list comprehensions used only for side effects with regular for loops. The codebase had 12 instances where list comprehensions were creating temporary list objects that were immediately discarded, consuming unnecessary memory and CPU cycles in performance-critical rendering code.

Changes:

• birdfish/lights.py: Converted 9 list comprehensions to for loops in BaseLightElement.update(), BaseLightElement.trigger(), LightGroup.trigger(), LightGroup.set_intensity(), Chase.render(), and Spawner.spawn()
• birdfish/effects.py: Converted 2 list comprehensions to for loops in Twinkle.update() and Twinkle._off_trigger()
• birdfish/output/base.py: Converted 1 list comprehension to for loop in BaseNetwork.update_data()
• Added efficiency_report.md documenting this and 5 other potential efficiency improvements

All changes are purely mechanical transformations from [expr for x in items] to for x in items: expr with no logic changes.

Review & Testing Checklist for Human

• Run existing test suite - I couldn't run pytest in the environment, so runtime behavior is unverified
• Test live lighting control - Verify the system still works correctly at 40 FPS with actual hardware/simulation
• Spot check the transformations - Review a few of the changes to confirm they're semantically equivalent (e.g., lines 181-182, 355-358, 583-587 in lights.py)

Test Plan

1. Run python -m pytest tests/ to verify existing tests pass
2. If possible, test with actual lighting hardware or simulation to ensure rendering still works correctly
3. Monitor memory usage to confirm the optimization has the expected positive impact

Notes

• All 12 transformations follow the same pattern and should be safe, but untested changes in performance-critical code warrant careful review
• The efficiency report identifies 5 additional optimization opportunities for future consideration
• Session: https://app.devin.ai/sessions/e0ad765cdb26445bb7a1238dadd30d17
• Requested by: Preston Holmes (@ptone)

[devin-ai-integration]

🤖 Devin AI Engineer

I'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know:

✅ I will automatically:

• Address comments on this PR. Add '(aside)' to your comment to have me ignore it.
• Look at CI failures and help fix them

Note: I can only respond to comments from users who have write access to this repository.

⚙️ Control Options:

• Disable automatic comment and CI monitoring

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @ptone, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the performance of the BirdFish lighting control framework by addressing specific Python coding patterns that were creating unnecessary overhead. By converting list comprehensions used for side effects into more direct for loops, the changes aim to reduce temporary object creation, thereby conserving memory and CPU cycles in performance-critical rendering code. This is a foundational step towards a more optimized and responsive real-time lighting system.

Highlights

• Performance Optimization: Replaced 12 instances of inefficient list comprehensions, used only for side effects, with standard for loops across birdfish/lights.py, birdfish/effects.py, and birdfish/output/base.py to improve memory and CPU efficiency.
• Code Semantics: The transformations are purely mechanical, converting [expr for x in items] to for x in items: expr, ensuring no logic changes were introduced.
• Documentation: A new file, efficiency_report.md, has been added to document this optimization and identify 5 additional potential efficiency improvements for future consideration within the BirdFish framework.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request effectively improves memory efficiency by replacing list comprehensions used for side effects with standard for loops. The changes are applied consistently across multiple files and are a welcome optimization for this performance-sensitive application. The new efficiency_report.md is also a valuable addition for tracking and planning future work. I've found one critical pre-existing bug that was carried over in the refactoring in birdfish/effects.py which will cause a NameError and should be addressed.

[gemini-code-assist]

This loop iterates over targets, but targets is not defined in this method's scope. This will raise a NameError at runtime. Based on the if block above and the logic in BaseEffect.get_targets, it seems you intended to use self.targets instead.

This appears to be a pre-existing issue, but since this line is being modified, it's a good opportunity to fix it.

Suggested change

	for t in targets:
	t.set_intensity(0)
	for t in self.targets:
	t.set_intensity(0)