Change CHANGLOG.md #427
Change CHANGLOG.md #427
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @YangSen-qn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! 此拉取请求主要侧重于为 2.17.0 版本做准备，通过更新 Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: YangSen-qn The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| ## 优化 | ||
| 1. 下载对 CDN 友好，访问使 CDN 触发缓存 | ||
| 2. 下载废弃 --public，改为内部判定 | ||
| 3. listbucket2 接口优化 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
“listbucket2 接口优化” 这个描述过于模糊，建议提供更多细节来说明具体的优化点。例如，是提升了性能、减少了内存占用，还是改变了接口行为？清晰的变更日志能帮助用户更好地理解每个版本的更新内容。
Code Review SummaryOverall, this PR improves logging safety with nil checks. However, there are a few noteworthy issues to address: Key Findings:
See inline comments for details. |
![xgopilot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1924301?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| workList := make([]*WorkInfo, 0, f.doWorkInfoListCount) | ||
| for { | ||
| hasMore, workInfo, err := f.WorkProvider.Provide() | ||
| log.DebugF("work producer get work, hasMore:%v, workInfo: %+v, err: %+v", hasMore, workInfo, err) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The logging here still uses the full workInfo struct with %+v. This should also be changed to use workInfoData for consistency with the error handling below. Consider extracting workInfoData before this line and using it throughout:
workInfoData := ""
if workInfo != nil {
workInfoData = workInfo.Data
}
log.DebugF("work producer get work, hasMore:%v, workInfo: %s, err: %+v", hasMore, workInfoData, err)This prevents verbose logging when workInfo contains complex struct data.
| f.notifyWorkSkip(workInfo, nil, err) | ||
| } else { | ||
| // 没有读到任何数据 | ||
| if workInfo == nil || len(workInfo.Data) == 0 { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since workInfoData is already extracted above (lines 109-112), use it here instead of accessing workInfo.Data directly:
| if workInfo == nil || len(workInfo.Data) == 0 { | |
| if workInfo == nil || len(workInfoData) == 0 { |
This maintains consistency and avoids redundant field access.
1 participant
变更背景描述
jira issue链接
主要变更点
Checklist