Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 29, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 8.53.18.54.0 age confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 8.53.18.54.0 age confidence
eslint-plugin-playwright 2.5.02.5.1 age confidence
typescript-eslint (source) 8.53.18.54.0 age confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v8.54.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin-internal: add prefer-tsutils-methods rule (#​11974, #​11625)
  • typescript-estree: add shortcut methods to ParserServicesWithTypeInformation (#​11965, #​11955)
🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] check both base constraint and actual type for non-null assertions (#​11967, #​11559)
  • deps: update dependency prettier to v3.8.0 (#​11991)
  • scope-manager: fix catch clause scopes def.name (#​11982)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unused-private-class-members] private destructured class member is defined but used (#​11785)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v8.54.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

mskelton/eslint-plugin-playwright (eslint-plugin-playwright)

v2.5.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • no-conditional-in-test: Fix false positive for || (611657c)
typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (typescript-eslint)

v8.54.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team January 29, 2026 06:10
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from psrna and zdrapela January 29, 2026 06:10
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 29, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign albarbaro for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Hi @renovate[bot]. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a redhat-developer member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from a49afd5 to 0c2ad50 Compare January 29, 2026 08:17
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚫 Image Push Skipped.

The container image push was skipped because the build was skipped (either due to [skip-build] tag or no relevant changes with existing image)

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 0c2ad50 to 67e921e Compare January 29, 2026 10:32
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚫 Image Push Skipped.

The container image push was skipped because the build was skipped (either due to [skip-build] tag or no relevant changes with existing image)

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 67e921e to 175a355 Compare January 29, 2026 11:10
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚫 Image Push Skipped.

The container image push was skipped because the build was skipped (either due to [skip-build] tag or no relevant changes with existing image)

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 175a355 to 9b8a9e6 Compare January 29, 2026 11:58
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 9b8a9e6 to 1e12ef0 Compare January 29, 2026 13:37
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚫 Image Push Skipped.

The container image push was skipped because the build was skipped (either due to [skip-build] tag or no relevant changes with existing image)

Signed-off-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/linters-(non-major) branch from 1e12ef0 to 6b94794 Compare January 29, 2026 17:38
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency eslint-plugin-playwright to v2.5.1 chore(deps): update linters (non-major) Jan 29, 2026
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants