-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
remove assessment workflow #132
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
elai-shalev
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some more comments:
-
Should we remove the deprecation notices from all docs and relevant files now that the deprecation has been performed?
-
Were all templates tested after the changes? The templates can be unpredictable with changes, especially when changing the workflow in the skeleton projects
| @@ -32,59 +30,54 @@ functions: | |||
| - name: assessmentResult | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
About L18-30
So we're keeping the "SampleAssessment" java class, but only updating the workflowId and not "mimicing the assessment"? Did you consider renaming this action + Java class to have no "assessment" wording remaining?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i prefer not to rename or change the logic. i think this will be revised later on by motu and piotr and you and others. not sure which direction this will go. so better keep it simple.
@elai-shalev about the deprecation notice we should ask @pkliczewski and @masayag and perhaps you have an opinion. what do u suggest? |
FLPATH-2324 https://issues.redhat.com/browse/FLPATH-2324 Signed-off-by: Yaron Dayagi <ydayagi@redhat.com>
|
I removed the deprecation notice |
|
Hey @ydayagi To test the software templates, you need:
|
|
Also about the deprecation notice, I think we should remove all notices in a seperate PR once all code deprecation PRs are merged |
|
@elai-shalev @masayag during planning we said the @elai-shalev will test software templates. so I think we can go ahead and merge |
elai-shalev
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, withstanding the templates were not tested thoroughly. If needed a patch/fix will be added.
FLPATH-2324
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/FLPATH-2324