Switch to target_link_libraries in rcl.#1051
Merged
clalancette merged 1 commit intorollingfrom Mar 30, 2023
Merged
Conversation
This makes it possible to hide some of our libraries, which is much nicer for downstream projects. It also means we can export fewer dependencies. Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clalancette@gmail.com>
Contributor
Author
|
CI:
|
emersonknapp
approved these changes
Mar 29, 2023
danthony06
pushed a commit
to danthony06/rcl
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 14, 2023
This makes it possible to hide some of our libraries, which is much nicer for downstream projects. It also means we can export fewer dependencies. Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clalancette@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This makes it possible to hide some of our libraries, which is much nicer for downstream projects. It also means we can export fewer dependencies.
@emersonknapp FYI, this is the followup to #1027