Worked through checklists and evidences for TT-EXPECTATIONS #24
Conversation
Erikhu1
changed the title
…ased Signed-off-by: LucaFue <luca.fueger@d-fine.de>
…ased Signed-off-by: LucaFue <luca.fueger@d-fine.de>
| - **Answer**: The nlohmann/json library does not have any external dependencies apart from the testing pipeline, so there are no dependencies that could possibly affect the Expectations. | ||
| - Are input analysis findings from components, tools, and data considered in relation to Expectations? | ||
| - **Answer**: | ||
| - **Answer**: For components, there is no input analysis as the nlohmann/json library has no external components (see JLS-34). For Tools, a tool assessment is provided via JLS-50. In addition, the only data provided to the nlohmann/json library is the input data when using the libraries' functionality, as well as the test data taken from [here](https://github.com/nlohmann/json_test_data). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You still haven't mentioned anything about input analysis findings for the json_test_data and whether it was considered for the Expectations
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I adapted the answer.
Generally, I would advise against a full input analysis of json_test_data because it aggregates large, well-known, independently curated JSON test suites that are already specifically designed to cover malformed inputs, edge cases, and realistic usage, so re-classifying every file would be a high-effort, low-benefit exercise that would also be hard to keep up to date as upstream data evolves. In our context, we already combine these corpora with nlohmann/json’s own tests and fuzzing and achieve very high coverage.
| - **Answer**: No downstream consumers exist yet to validate this. However, the AOUs are structured with the intent to guide downstream consumers in extending existing Statements. | ||
| - Do they provide clear guidance for upstreams on reusing components with | ||
| well-defined claims? | ||
| - **Answer**: |
Worked through and filled out checklists and evidences for all TAs associated with TT-Expectations: