chore: refactor FromExpr's operatorType #32
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes update two files. In Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Parser as FromExpr
participant Helper as stringToOperator
Parser->>Helper: Map operator string to Operator
alt Operator found
Helper-->>Parser: Return Operator, true
Parser->>Parser: Append Operator to tree
else Operator not found
Helper-->>Parser: Return zero value, false
Parser->>Parser: Return error
end
Possibly related PRs
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 golangci-lint (1.64.8)Error: can't load config: can't set severity rule option: no default severity defined ✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tree_builder.go (1)
136-177: Consider addressing the TODO commentsThe function is well-structured and follows the standard Go pattern of returning a tuple with a boolean success indicator. However, there are two TODO comments about potentially rerouting
And2toAndandOr2toOr. Consider either implementing this rerouting or removing the comments if they're not intended for immediate action.case And2.String(): - return And2, true // NOTE: re-route to And? + return And2, true case Or.String(): return Or, true case Or2.String(): - return Or2, true // NOTE: re-route to Or? + return Or2, trueOr if you want to implement the rerouting:
case And2.String(): - return And2, true // NOTE: re-route to And? + return And, true case Or.String(): return Or, true case Or2.String(): - return Or2, true // NOTE: re-route to Or? + return Or, true
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
object.go(1 hunks)tree_builder.go(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
object.go (1)
value_undefined.go (1)
NewUndefinedWithReasonf(24-28)
tree_builder.go (1)
operator.go (19)
Operator(3-3)Plus(11-11)Minus(12-12)Multiply(13-13)Divide(14-14)Modulus(15-15)Power(16-16)LShift(17-17)RShift(18-18)LessThan(19-19)LessThanOrEqual(20-20)EqualTo(21-21)NotEqualTo(22-22)GreaterThan(23-23)GreaterThanOrEqual(24-24)And(25-25)And2(26-26)Or(27-27)Or2(28-28)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
object.go (1)
59-59: Clearer error message, good improvementThe simplified error message is clearer and more direct, removing the redundant "[Variable]" label whilst maintaining all the essential information. This aligns well with the PR objective to improve clarity.
tree_builder.go (1)
45-49: Clean refactoring of operator lookupExtracting the operator string mapping logic into a separate function is a good maintainability improvement. The code is now more readable and the operator mapping logic is centralised in one place.
Summary by CodeRabbit