chore: add more tests to Number #33
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes consist of updates and additions to test files. In Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)No sequence diagram generated as the changes are limited to test formatting and test coverage expansion, without modifications to control flow or feature logic. ✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
value_number_test.go (1)
585-608: Consider implementing the TODOs for remaining test functions.Several mathematical functions still have TODO comments without test cases (Sin, Cos, Tan, Ln, Log, Floor, Trunc). Since you're adding comprehensive tests for the Number type, consider implementing these as well for complete test coverage.
// Example test case for Sin func TestNumber_Sin(t *testing.T) { type fields struct { Undefined Undefined value decimal.Decimal } tests := []struct { name string fields fields want Number }{ { name: "sin of zero", fields: fields{value: decimal.New(0, 0)}, want: Number{value: decimal.New(0, 0)}, }, { name: "sin of PI/2", fields: fields{value: decimal.NewFromFloat(math.Pi / 2)}, want: Number{value: decimal.NewFromFloat(1.0)}, }, // Add more test cases as needed } for _, tt := range tests { t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) { n := Number{ Undefined: tt.fields.Undefined, value: tt.fields.value, } got := n.Sin() // For floating point comparisons, use approximate equality if !got.value.Equal(tt.want.value) { t.Errorf("Number.Sin() = %v, want %v", got, tt.want) } }) } }Also applies to: 610-633, 674-697, 699-726, 728-755, 757-780, 782-809
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
tree_builder_test.go(2 hunks)value_number_test.go(18 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
value_number_test.go (2)
value_number.go (1)
Number(10-13)value_undefined.go (3)
Undefined(16-18)Undefined(91-93)Undefined(95-97)
🔇 Additional comments (20)
tree_builder_test.go (2)
80-93: Improved readability with multi-line formatting.The expression string reformatting enhances code readability by visually representing the nested function calls and indentation structure. This makes the complex tree structure more intuitive to understand.
293-293: Enhanced commented example for future array feature.The commented example has been updated to demonstrate a more complex use case with formulae and two-dimensional array notation. This provides better guidance for future implementation.
value_number_test.go (18)
425-439: Well-structured test cases for IntPart.The test cases effectively cover the key scenarios: positive numbers, negative numbers, and zero. Good job including decimal values to verify proper integer extraction.
468-485: Comprehensive bit shift test coverage.The left shift tests properly validate both positive and negative number handling, as well as error conditions with negative shift counts. This ensures proper bounds checking in the implementation.
514-531: Thorough right shift test cases.The tests for RShift cover both positive and negative operands, properly checking error conditions with negative shift counts. The test values (500 → 62) verify the proper truncation behavior.
556-570: Complete negation test coverage.The tests thoroughly cover all important Neg scenarios: negating positive numbers, negating negative numbers, and negating zero. This ensures proper sign handling.
645-659: Comprehensive square root test cases.The tests cover positive numbers, zero, and error handling for negative inputs. The precision of the expected value for the positive case (962.9870196) properly tests decimal handling.
821-835: Thorough factorial test coverage.The tests address all key scenarios: positive integers, zero (special case), and proper error handling for negative inputs. This ensures robust validation of the factorial implementation.
864-881: Comprehensive comparison operator tests.The LessThan tests effectively cover all three possible scenarios: when the number is less than, not less than, and equal to the comparison value. This ensures correct boolean return values.
910-927: Well-structured LessThanOrEqual tests.The tests cover all edge cases for the operator: less than, greater than, and equality. The implementation correctly distinguishes between strict inequality and equality-inclusive comparison.
956-967: Complete EqualTo test coverage.The tests verify both equality and inequality scenarios, ensuring correct boolean value returns in both cases.
996-1007: Thorough NotEqualTo test coverage.The tests properly cover both inequality and equality cases, verifying the correct boolean return values. The test cases ensure logical consistency with the EqualTo method.
1036-1053: Comprehensive GreaterThan test coverage.The tests cover all three possible scenarios: when the number is greater than, not greater than, and equal to the comparison value. This ensures correct boolean return values.
1082-1099: Well-structured GreaterThanOrEqual tests.The tests cover all edge cases for the operator: greater than, less than, and equality. The implementation correctly distinguishes between strict inequality and equality-inclusive comparison.
1124-1153: Extensive String representation tests.The tests cover a comprehensive range of number types: positive, negative, zero, decimal, large, and small numbers. This ensures proper string formatting in all cases.
1178-1202: Complete Bool conversion tests.The tests thoroughly verify conversion to boolean values for various number types: non-zero positive, zero, negative, decimal, and zero decimal. This ensures consistent type conversion behavior.
1227-1256: Comprehensive AsString conversion tests.The tests cover the same comprehensive range as the String method tests, ensuring consistent behavior between direct string representation and explicit type conversion.
1281-1330: Extensive Number conversion tests.The tests cover a wide range of number types and edge cases, ensuring proper handling of identity conversion across various numeric values. This thoroughness helps prevent regression issues.
1355-1414: Thorough Float64 conversion tests.The tests comprehensively cover conversions from various decimal values to float64, including precision considerations for large and small numbers. The comments about architecture-dependent rounding are especially helpful.
1439-1473: Complete Int64 conversion tests.The tests effectively cover the truncation behavior when converting decimal numbers to integers. The test cases demonstrate proper handling of various scenarios including large values and fractional parts.
Summary by CodeRabbit